grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> writes: > Always wondered how naming is relevant, > for example, IPv6 with OnionCat as a deterministic > form of naming. So now we propose a 'naming' layer. > Which should not also support IPv6 addressing? > Is not IPv6, subsequent to the 80bit scheme, > merely a name on top of onions? ie: If we develop > a 'naming' layer, can we not develop an IPv6 layer?
What do you mean by "develop an IPv6 layer"? A naming layer would provide human-memorable names; IPv6 addresses are not supposed to be human memorable. _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
