Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 274: A Name System API for Tor Onion Services

[grarpamp]

Always wondered how naming is relevant,
for example, IPv6 with OnionCat as a deterministic
form of naming. So now we propose a 'naming' layer.
Which should not also support IPv6 addressing?
Is not IPv6, subsequent to the 80bit scheme,
merely a name on top of onions? ie: If we develop
a 'naming' layer, can we not develop an IPv6 layer?
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev