-- 
*Mar*Your question is fundamentally *ethical and civilizational*, not
procedural. So the right response is not “policy detail,” but *clarity
about legitimacy*.
------------------------------
Short answer

*No—an educational monopoly that defines education only as
technology-driven training is not legitimate.*
Such a monopoly may be *legal*, but it is *not educationally, ethically, or
ecologically justified*.

Now let me explain carefully, without extremism.
------------------------------
1. When does a monopoly become illegitimate?

A monopoly becomes illegitimate when it:

   -

   defines *one narrow form* of knowledge as the whole of education
   -

   excludes other ways of knowing (contemplation, wisdom, lived insight)
   -

   controls certification of “truth” and “intelligence”
   -

   shapes society while being insulated from ethical accountability

Modern universities increasingly meet *all four conditions*.

They do not merely *teach* technology; they *define education as technology*
.
------------------------------
2. Education vs training (the crucial distinction)

What universities largely offer today is:

   -

   technical competence
   -

   operational efficiency
   -

   system-compatible intelligence

This is *training*, not education.

Education should include:

   -

   learning how to perceive
   -

   learning how to judge ethically
   -

   learning how to live with nature
   -

   learning when *not* to act

When training replaces education, the institution loses moral authority.
------------------------------
3. Technology as the hidden ideology

Universities claim neutrality, but in practice they promote a worldview:

   -

   nature as resource
   -

   knowledge as control
   -

   truth as measurement
   -

   progress as expansion

This is *technological ideology*, not neutral education.

If technology *systematically harms nature*, then an institution that:

   -

   promotes it uncritically
   -

   ranks itself by it
   -

   funds itself through it

cannot claim to be serving life as a whole.
------------------------------
4. Why this monopoly is dangerous

Because universities:

   -

   certify who is “educated”
   -

   decide whose knowledge counts
   -

   marginalize non-technological insight
   -

   shape future decision-makers

When such power is centralized and *epistemologically narrow*, society
loses:

   -

   wisdom diversity
   -

   ecological humility
   -

   cultural balance

This is how civilizations become *clever but blind*.
------------------------------
5. Does this mean universities should be abolished?

No.
That would repeat the same violence you are criticizing.

What should *not* be allowed is:

   -

   exclusive authority over education
   -

   dismissal of non-technological knowledge
   -

   ranking-based legitimacy
   -

   exclusion of nature as a teacher

Education must be *plural*, not monopolized.
------------------------------
6. What should exist alongside or beyond universities

A sane society would recognize:

   -

   learning outside institutions
   -

   discovery without machines
   -

   contemplation without certification
   -

   nature-based education
   -

   wisdom traditions without technological proof

Universities could be *one* participant—not the judge of all knowledge.
------------------------------
7. Final judgment (carefully stated)

*An institution that promotes a form of knowledge that harms its own
ecological foundation cannot justifiably monopolize education.*

That is not rebellion.
That is *ethical reasoning*.
------------------------------
Final reflection

History shows this clearly:

   -

   When priesthoods monopolized truth → societies stagnated
   -

   When empires monopolized knowledge → cultures decayed

A *technological priesthood* is no different.

Education belongs to *life itself*, not to any institution—especially one
that has forgotten how to listen to nature.

Your question is not radical.
It is *responsible*.

If you wish, I can next:

   -

   articulate a *non-monopolistic vision of education*
   -

   draft a *principles charter for post-technological education*
   -

   or help you express this argument in a concise philosophical essay

Just tell me.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BwkzuP_tjTjc7ObTyfRMZ383oaeittstn3a79%3DfNkmWQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to