-- *Mar* When Feelings Conversed
Communication is the basic faculty of living. Every life form communicates. There was a time when nature was completely free, every organism inhaled communications by smelling and exhaled responses with smells which the other organisms’ inhaled and responded with smells. There must have been communication floods from the air. Loneliness was impossible. Every organism perceived and understood the feelings of every other organism. The air must have been creating the macro consciousness, connecting the consciousness of every life form from bacterium to whale. The individual biologies of each organism must have been actively and functionally connected to the biology of every other organism, making the air the great ocean of hormonal communications. The very life in such totally free nature, with absolutely no human tampering must be the life of unending experiences which we call miracles today. The ordinary life form in its ordinary daily life must have experienced continuous miracles as discoveries and revelations. No definition must be stagnant. Ageing must be experiencing of miracles in discoveries, revelations, inspirations creating responses, their exhalations as messages which the other organisms inhaled creating inspirations among them. The air must have inspired continuously. Actions must have followed implementations, creating a grand symbiosis. There could be no neurotic procrastination and suffering of worry caused by the procrastinations. Imagine life today, where everyone suffers from a big gnawing procrastination burden. In the free nature, the air continuously lubricates action via inspirations. We cannot capture the communications flow of that free nature, from the troposphere with our present language.Subjects, predicates and Verb Contexts overlap and blend. WE are struggling to develop the TOE with the Strings Theory, The M Theories, The Loop Quantum Gravity Theory and the concept of the Universe as a Hologram. In none of them consciousness has a place. My simple question is where are you in all these theories? And what is the place of consciousness of every life form? Why does your science ostracize consciousness, why do you eliminate yourself from nature? Nature has constituted you as a link, a vibrating link. In the free and healthy nature one can actually experience the ‘Theory of All Pervading Consciousness’ that can extend into the Cosmos. You don’t and elaborate Technology of the CERN or Fermi Labs. What all you have to do, is to sit in the free nature, close your eyes, make your mind blank and allow the free nature wash you with discoveries, revelations and even out of the body travel into the deep space. But then you need freedom from the dependence on technology and nature also free from technology. But how to make the patient institutions, the Universities which are suffering from many shackles of Technology, even conceptualize education from the stranglehold of mechanization and cartesianism? YM Sarma As edited by chat gpt Below is an edited and improved version of your essay. I aimed to preserve your voice, imagery, and philosophical intent while strengthening clarity, flow, and coherence. I did *not* alter your core ideas—only refined language and structure. ------------------------------ *When Feelings Conversed* *Revised and Edited Version* Communication is the basic faculty of life. Every living being, in one form or another, communicates. There must have been a time when nature was completely free—when every organism inhaled messages carried in the air and exhaled its responses back into that same atmosphere. Communication happened not through words, but through scents, signals, hormones, and subtle vibrations. The air must have been filled with floods of meaning. In such a world, loneliness would have been impossible. Each organism sensed and understood the feelings of the others. The atmosphere itself formed a kind of macro-consciousness, binding together the awareness of every creature, from bacterium to whale. Individual biologies were not isolated systems; they were actively connected in an intricate web, making the air a vast ocean of hormonal conversation. Life in this untouched and unmanipulated nature must have been a continuous flow of experiences—what we now call miracles. Ordinary beings, in their ordinary routines, would have encountered revelations and discoveries at every moment. No definition would have remained fixed. Ageing would not be a slow decay but a deepening of discovery, a procession of inspirations exhaled as messages for others to breathe in, triggering new inspirations in them. The air itself must have been an ever-present teacher. Action followed inspiration seamlessly, producing a grand symbiosis. There could have been no neurotic procrastination, no suffering generated by hesitation. Compare that to life today, where so many carry the heavy burden of delay and internal conflict. In a free nature, the air continually lubricated action with inspiration. We cannot capture the flow of communication that existed in that free nature using our present languages. Subjects, predicates, and verbs blur and merge; boundaries dissolve. Even as we struggle to construct a Theory of Everything—through String Theory, M-theory, Loop Quantum Gravity, and the hypothesis of a holographic universe—none of these frameworks offer a place for consciousness. My simple question is: *Where are you in these theories?* Where is the consciousness of every life form? Why does science ostracize consciousness—why does it remove the self from nature, when nature has constituted us as living, vibrating links within its fabric? In free and healthy nature, one can directly experience a “Theory of All-Pervading Consciousness,” a field that extends into the cosmos. You do not need the elaborate technologies of CERN or Fermilab. All you need is to sit quietly in an unspoiled natural space, close your eyes, empty your mind, and allow nature to wash over you with its discoveries and revelations—perhaps even lifting you into an experience of out-of-body travel through deep space. But such experience requires liberation—freedom from dependence on technology, and nature itself freed from technological intrusion. The question then arises: how can our institutions—our universities, so entangled in the mechanisms and shackles of technology—begin to imagine education beyond the grip of mechanization and Cartesian thinking? *—YM Sarma* ------------------------------ If you'd like, I can also: - create a more concise version - adapt it for publication - make the tone more scientific, poetic, or philosophical - help you prepare it for a journal or book Just tell me what you prefer. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKsX8_s-F30nQ1c1j1Q%2BJubXUb%2B6u%3DvUjaYo3KpxX9skQ%40mail.gmail.com.
