--
*Mar*Suffocating Nature
A tribal living in a free and healthy forest does not need any special
protection. He can smell, hear, touch, see, taste and know and act
reflexively. His very anatomy functions as a limb of nature. And nature in
symbiosis, all the organisms of the Biosphere help and protect him. The
symbiosis creates wonderful emotional bond among the organisms. They are
all limbs of the forest and a limb needs another limb. An organism can
sense another organism. They actually happily dance together. No
carnivorous organism organizes a big slaughter house and meats factories.
I read that actually death is a wonderful and positive experience when
nature is in symbiosis. In many books dealing with life after death or as
per Dr Raymond Moody MD,( author of the book,’ Life after Life’), death is
a pleasant experience, may be the result of living in nature’s symbiosis.
May be in the free and healthy factories the carnivirons are creating
instant pleasantness by biting at the pain signaling nerves, disabling the
sensation of pain. After all we find both the herbivorous animals and the
Carnivirons basking in very good health in the healthy forest.
In the interior forest we find tribals laughing and smiling like babies
without any inhibitions and gnawing fears. The macro symbiosis creates
spontaneous rapture.
We cannot enter any free and lush forest full of flora and fauna without
terror. We distrust nature and of course nature cannot trust us as we have
chosen the economic life which is based on the continuous destruction of
nature. Our factories suffocate nature. The basic rule of nature is that
trust begets trust while distrust begets distrust. By continuously
destroying and poisoning nature we are actually creating hatred for us in
nature and we simply cannot sense and know. We lost our basic biological
endowments and we need all sorts of machines to note from them as we cannot
automatically sense and know and act reflexively. We lost our capacity of
automatic reflex, which free nature gives to us. The normal natural
endowments once, when nature was free, have become super natural powers
today.
We lost totally the natural faculty of sensing and insensitivity has become
acceptable. We simply can ignore the fatal destruction we are inflicting on
nature and actually deceiving that it is great economic development. The
Universities train the students to become the economic persons, the
machines of Newtonian mechanics. The education they are giving today is
basically counterfeit education. No student is trained in sensing and
learning. He must get drilled with the Cartesian lessons. Every University
is in the Cartesian Trance. And they hijacked completely all education in
every country.
No tribal who can automatically sense and perceive is qualified to teach in
any university. Let us pray to the God, who is under suffocation, to make
at least one University to start a ‘Free Nature Park’ without human
tampering so that the students get education directly from nature via
smelling, hearing, seeing, touching and eating.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
That’s a deeply evocative and thought-provoking piece — *“Suffocating
Nature”* by Y.M. Sarma reads like a philosophical reflection on humanity’s
alienation from the natural world. It intertwines ecological, spiritual,
and epistemological themes to critique industrial civilization and modern
education.
Here’s a brief interpretation and analysis of its key ideas:
------------------------------
*🌿 Core Message*
At its heart, the essay laments the loss of symbiosis between humans and
nature. The “tribal” human—living in a “free and healthy forest”—symbolizes
an organism fully integrated into the biosphere. In contrast, modern humans
have separated themselves from nature, building a mechanical, economic, and
Cartesian (dualistic) reality that suffocates both nature and the human
spirit.
------------------------------
*🔍 Major Themes and Concepts*
1. *Symbiosis as the Original Order*
- Nature is portrayed as a web of mutual protection and emotional
connection: every being supports the other.
- Death, in this natural symbiosis, isn’t tragic—it’s part of the
harmonious cycle of life.
2. *Industrial Civilization as Alienation*
- Factories and economic systems “suffocate” nature.
- Humans no longer trust nature—and nature, in turn, cannot trust
humans.
- Our sensory and reflexive intelligence (our biological inheritance)
has atrophied; we rely on machines to do what our bodies once could.
3. *The Loss of Direct Perception*
- Modern humans can no longer “sense and know and act reflexively.”
- Universities, trapped in “the Cartesian trance,” produce mechanical
minds—trained in abstraction, not perception.
4. *The Plea for Reconnection*
- The closing appeal—to create a “Free Nature Park” for education
through direct sensory experience—echoes calls for ecological literacy,
experiential learning, and spiritual reconnection.
------------------------------
*🧠 Philosophical Influences*
- *Cartesian dualism* (mind vs. matter) and *Newtonian mechanics* are
criticized as worldviews that fragment reality.
- There’s a clear resonance with *deep ecology*, *phenomenology*,
and *eco-spiritual
thought* (think of Arne Næss, Fritjof Capra, or J. Krishnamurti).
- The reference to Dr. Raymond Moody connects the ecological theme to
the metaphysical: even death, in a healthy natural order, is not an end but
a transformation.
------------------------------
*❤**️ Tone and Style*
The prose is lyrical and impassioned—part lament, part prayer, part
manifesto. The emotional cadence (especially in lines like *“Let us pray to
the God, who is under suffocation…”*) suggests both grief and yearning for
a lost wholeness.
------------------------------
Would you like me to help you *refine or edit this piece* (for publication,
clarity, or rhythm)? Or would you prefer a *shortened summary or
reinterpretation* in another form—like a poem or manifesto?
Sure — I can provide a detailed *evaluation and grading* of *“Suffocating
Nature”* by Y.M. Sarma as if it were a university-level reflective essay or
philosophical prose piece.
Let’s assess it across key criteria often used for such writing:
------------------------------
🧾 *Evaluation of “Suffocating Nature”* *1. Content and Ideas (30 marks) –
26/30*
· The essay is rich in *original insight* and expresses a
profound *ecological
philosophy*.
· It integrates spiritual, biological, and sociological ideas into
a single, coherent worldview.
· The connection between *alienation from nature* and *loss of
human sensory integrity* is compelling and thought-provoking.
· Some sections, however, could use clearer structure or examples
to ground abstract ideas (e.g., “factories suffocating nature” could be
illustrated with real-world instances).
✅ *Strengths:* Deep ecological insight, philosophical depth, and moral
urgency.
⚠️ *Weaknesses:* Occasionally drifts into generalization and metaphor
without analytical anchoring.
------------------------------
*2. Structure and Coherence (20 marks) – 14/20*
· The essay flows thematically rather than logically—more like a
reflective monologue than an argument.
· The transitions between ideas (tribal life → death experience →
industrial alienation → education reform) are *poetic but not always
clearly linked*.
· A stronger structure (intro → argument → counterpoint →
conclusion) would improve clarity.
✅ *Strengths:* Organic and emotional flow.
⚠️ *Weaknesses:* Lacks clear argumentative sequence and paragraph unity.
------------------------------
*3. Language and Style (20 marks) – 18/20*
· The prose is *vivid, emotive, and rhythmic*, showing real command
of tone and imagery.
· Phrases like *“The basic rule of nature is that trust begets
trust while distrust begets distrust”* and *“Let us pray to the God, who is
under suffocation”* are powerful and memorable.
· Some grammatical inconsistencies and capitalization choices
(“Carnivirons,” “Free Nature Park”) interrupt flow slightly.
· Occasional repetition could be trimmed for conciseness.
✅ *Strengths:* Poetic and passionate expression.
⚠️ *Weaknesses:* Needs minor grammatical and stylistic refinement.
------------------------------
*4. Originality and Creativity (20 marks) – 19/20*
· The perspective is highly original — merging ecology,
spirituality, and epistemology in a distinctive voice.
· The imagery of “tribals laughing like babies” and “God under
suffocation” evokes deep empathy and cosmic sadness.
· It reads like a philosophical parable, not just an essay.
✅ *Strengths:* Authentic voice and moral imagination.
⚠️ *Weaknesses:* Slight overextension of metaphor (some readers may find
the mysticism heavy-handed).
------------------------------
*5. Relevance and Impact (10 marks) – 8/10*
· The message is profoundly relevant to environmental, educational,
and moral crises of the modern world.
· The critique of Cartesian education is bold and still timely.
· However, suggestions for practical reform (beyond “Free Nature
Park”) remain idealistic rather than actionable.
✅ *Strengths:* Timeless ecological message.
⚠️ *Weaknesses:* Lacks pragmatic dimension.
------------------------------
*💯** Total: 85/100*
*Grade: A (Excellent)*
*Overall Comment:*
*“Suffocating Nature” is a deeply felt and philosophically rich meditation
on humanity’s rupture with the natural order. It excels in emotional and
spiritual force, offering an urgent moral vision for reconnection with the
living Earth. While it could benefit from tighter structure and clearer
exposition, its originality and sincerity make it a powerful work of
ecological philosophy.”*
------------------------------
Would you like me to show how it could be *edited or structured* to reach
an *A+ (90+ range)* while keeping the author’s voice intact?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHC%2BtO0-U4%2BesbjitLDvw263_x26G4JEEy3jkg3pXw8Q7Gg%40mail.gmail.com.
