Understanding Standards
Learning standards are one of the most important issues in public education
today, influencing every dimension of our educational system, from
high-stakes standardized testing to the topics and skills students are
taught in school to the professional development that teachers need to be
effective.
But understanding learning standards—what they are, how they work, why they
matter, and how they affect schools and students—is no easy task,
particularly given the wide range of terms and synonyms that educators use
when discussing the topic.
The following guide, comprising a selection of our entries, is intended to
provide a comprehensive introduction to learning standards and how they
work in our education system, which extends to related standards-based
strategies such as proficiency-based learning, curriculum mapping, and
backward design. Our goal, quite simply, is to make this complex topic more
accessible and understandable to journalists, parents, and community
members—anyone with an interest and investment in our public schools. If
you are looking for more detailed information and discussion, just click
through to the full entries for each term.
We also encourage educators to use this guide with their community,
republish the content on their website, or print it out for use during
meetings, discussions, and community forums. All of our entries and guides
have been published under a Creative Commons license—so if it helps you
out, go ahead and use it. As always, we welcome your recommendations for
improvement.
Learning standards are concise, written descriptions of what students are
expected to know and be able to do at a specific stage of their education.
Learning standards describe educational objectives, e.e., what students
should have learned by the end of a course, grade level, or grade span—but
they do not describe or mandate any teaching practice, curriculum, or
assessment method (although this is a source of ongoing confusion and
debate).
II The Taittireeya Upanishad The Testimony of a Complete
Education
India has an ancient heritage of education. The ancestry of Vedic
teaching and learning is a superb example of this. The type and extent of
education that had taken place in India is astounding. Variety and vastness
are both wedded to Indian education. This is easily experienced by glancing
through the Vedic literature. Above this, its greatest uniqueness is that
it is not lopsided or partial, but it is all-round and complete. It is not
fruitless or only fruitful to some extent, but it bears eternal fruits.
This is because it is alive, alive with Dharmaditya, alive with brahmavidyã.
Let us take a glimpse at this interesting Vedic education by pondering over
the Taittiriya Upanishad.
The Shiksha Valli:
The Taittireeya Upanishad commences trumpeting the words of the
Shikshãvalli – ‘शन्नो मित्रः शं वरुणः। शन्नो भवत्वर्यमा। शन्न इन्द्रो
बृहस्पतिः। शन्नो विष्णुरुरुक्रमः।’ – ‘Shanno mitraha sham Varunaha, shanno
bhavatvaryamã, shanna Indro Brushaspitihi, shanno Vishnururukramaha’
(Taittireeya Upanishad: 1/1). These are the words of the preceptors praying
for peace before giving their precepts. It is a request for bliss and peace
everywhere. Let the devas, like Mitra, Varuna, Aryamã, Bruhaspati and
others, who have been appointed by Paramãtmã to manage creation, be a
source of happiness for us and shower peace everywhere. This prayer to
Paramãtmã at the onset of this Upanishad asks for the good of the whole of
creation. This is the great and unique quality of Indian spiritual thought.
The elimination of everyone’s every misery, the experience of utmost bliss,
the attainment of utmost peace – this has been the direction of Hindu
Sanatan thinking.
I Bow to Aksharbrahman and Parbrahman
‘नमो ब्रह्मणे’ – ‘Namo Brahmane’ – ‘I bow to Brahman’ (Taittiriya
Upanishad: 1/1). Using just one word, ‘Brahmane’, the preceptor rishi bows
to the two divine entities Akshar brahman and Parabrahman. The reason for
this is that later in this Upanishad statements like ‘Brahmavidãpnoti
Param’ (Taittiriya Upanishad: 2/1) and ‘Satyam jnãnam anantam Brahma’
(Taittireeya Upanishad: 2/1) refer to Akshar brahman using the word
‘Brahman’, whereas statements like ‘Ãnando Brahmeti vyajãnãt’ (Taittireeya
Upanishad: 3/6) refer to Parabrahman using the word ‘Brahman’. Thus, using
the common word ‘Brahman’ for both Akshar brahman and Parabrahman, the
rishi bows with both these divine entities in mind using the words ‘Namo
Brahmane’ – ‘I bow to Akshar-Purushottam’.
The reason for this bow is understandable. Upanishads are the shastras for
brahmavidyã. The Upanishads themselves define brahmavidyã – ‘येनाऽक्षरं
पुरुषं वेद सत्यं प्रोवाच तां तत्त्वतो ब्रह्मविद्याम्।’ – ‘Yenã’ksharam
purusham veda satyam provãcha tãm tattvato brahmavidyãm’ – ‘That by which
Akshar, i.e., Akshar brahman, and Purush, i.e., Parabrahman, are known in
their essence is called brahmavidyã’ (Mundaka Upanishad: 1/2/13). For this
reason, in the Taittiriya Upanishad, both these divine entities of
brahmavidyã have been remembered and offered obeisance before precepts on
brahmavidyã commence.
After bowing, homage is now paid. ‘त्वमेव प्रत्यक्षं ब्रह्मासि’ –
‘Tvameva pratyaksham Brahmãsi’ (Taittireeya Upanishad: 1/1). The
manifestation of both Akshar brahman and Parabrahman is indicated here.
This feeling of manifestation should be developed towards the Gunãtit guru
and be repeatedly strengthened. The guru himself is Akshar brahman, and
Parabrahman continuously resides within him. Thus, this sentence implies
that we should serve the manifest guru with supreme divinity, for he is the
manifest form of Akshar brahman and Parabrahman. In this prayer for peace,
we also experience the noble conduct of the teaching rishi.
The Teacher's Vow of Truth
To speak the truth is the first necessity of a preceptor, tutor or teacher.
‘ऋतं वदिष्यामि। सत्यं वदिष्यामि।’ – ‘Rutam vadishyãmi; Satyam vadishyãmi’ –
‘I will only speak eternal principles. I will speak the truth (i.e., I will
not teach false principles)’ (Taittireeya Upanishad: 1/1). With these words
the rishi has vowed to speak the truth. Here, the rishi is a preceptor, a
tutor, a teacher and it is his duty to teach. To lie is a sin, but to teach
a lie would be a grave sin. This is a special feature of Vedic guru-shishya
dialogues. The teacher understands his responsibility to the disciple and
to society. He understands his duty. He is fully aware of how much a
defiled education can ravage a disciple’s life and affect the whole of
society.
Moreover, an honest person must be tolerant. He knows that he must bear the
occasional hostile reactions of speaking the truth. For this very reason,
knowing the continual necessity of such honest and tolerant preceptors in
society, the tutoring rishi prays, ‘तन्मामवतु। तद्वक्तारमवतु। अवतु माम्।
अवतु वक्तारम्।’ ‘Tanmãmavatu; tadvaktãramavatu; avatu mãm; avatu
vaktãram;’ – ‘O Lord! Save me. Save the orator, the teacher’ (Taittiriya
Upanishad: 1/1). Thus, the reason for praying for one’s safety is
ultimately just to keep society well educated.
Thus, this mantra shows the ideal approach a teacher should have before
commencing his lesson.
A Special Meaning of the word 'Shiksha'
Here, ‘shikshã’ doesn’t mean punishment, but education, and even in that, a
special type of education – education that is useful in the study of the
Vedas. Our Vedas are an ocean of special knowledge. To be a true scientist,
one must study them in detail. To study them, they must first be looked
after.
As per our ancient traditions, a special method for preserving the Vedas as
they have been practiced. This method is one of systematic pronunciation
and repetition. Thousands of years ago, when writing was not well
established, our Vedas were preserved by this pronounce and repeat method
of recitation. The fruits of this ancient tradition are the immense
collection of authentic mantras we find in the Vedas today. The science
that thoroughly explains this method of pronunciation and repetition is
‘shikshã’. This is explained in this Upanishad. ‘शीक्षां व्याख्यास्यामः’ –
‘Sheekshãm vyãkhyãsyãmaha’ – ‘Now we will explain shikshã’ (Taittireeya
Upanishad: 1/2). With this proposition, the rishi lists the main topics of
shikshã: ‘वर्णः स्वरः। मात्रा बलम्। साम सन्तानः। इत्युक्तः शीक्षाध्यायः।’
‘Varnaha svaraha; matrã balam; sãma santãnaha; ityuktaha sheekshãdhyãyaha’
(Taittireeya Upanishad: 1/2). Varnaha means letters. This includes vowels
such as ‘अ - a’, ‘इ - i’, ‘उ - u’, ‘ऋ - ru’, etc. and consonants such as ‘क
- ka’, ‘ख - kha’, ‘ग - ga’, ‘घ - gha’, etc. So that the mantras of the
Vedas can be pronounced properly, the shikshã texts first explain which
part of the mouth or throat the vowels and consonants originate, as well as
how they originate, and what their true pronunciation really is.
Svaraha means tone. Along with the pronunciation of the mantras, there is
an amazing system of tones to enable the singing of the mantras.
Mãtrã means duration. Here, the duration for which the vowels in the Vedic
mantras should be sounded is explained. Durations such as hrasva (short)
and deergha (long) indicate the length of pronunciation.
Balam means the force with which the letters in the mantra should be said.
Sãma means the similarity of the pronunciation of the letters.
Santãnaha means the system for pronouncing the words according to their
order. This is also known as sanhitã.
In this way, the Vedic Shiksha texts give a detailed explanation of the
aspects of pronunciation of the Vedic mantras that should be taken into
consideration.
Naturally, one may question the necessity of this entire system for just
the pronunciation of the Vedas. The answer is simple. Our Vedas are not
ordinary books, they are divine shastras. We will find the answer to our
question if we think back to thousands of years ago when there was no
method of preserving or protecting knowledge by writing it down. The Vedas
are an ocean of eternal principles. Each sentence is an eternal principle.
In order to preserve these principles, our ancestors felt it necessary to
first pronounce them properly, since the Vedas are recited as mantras.
Vedic mantras are composed from words. And words are composed of letters.
If the pronunciation or order of the words of the mantras is changed, then
principles may be changed or lost. For this reason, the Vedic schools first
taught their students about shikshã.
Thus, in the Taittiriya Upanishad, a proper explanation of shikshã, which
is useful for studying the Vedas, has been given. That is why this part of
the Upanishad is called the Shikshãvalli.
III Upanishadic way of teaching was deeply personal and dialogical.
In the Upanishads, we see students sitting at the feet of the guru, asking
profound questions about life, the self, and the universe. The teacher does
not immediately give direct answers. Instead, he guides the student to
think, reflect, and explore possible answers themselves. This guru–śiṣya
Samaveda (teacher–student dialogue) is not just a conversation — it is an
inquiry where the student’s own observation, reasoning, and inner
experience are all given importance. For example, in the Chāndogya
Upanishad, Śvetaketu is asked by his father to investigate the essence of
existence. Rather than simply telling him that all is one, the father asks
him to explore examples in the world — like how a seed becomes a tree, or
how salt dissolves in water — so that Śvetaketu can realize the truth
himself. Such pedagogy encourages students to engage with the subject
deeply and make it their own. It develops critical thinking, nurtures
curiosity, and respects the student’s capacity to discover knowledge. The
teacher becomes a guide who removes obstacles and clarifies doubts at the
right moments, but does not impose knowledge prematurely. This approach
also respects multiple ways of knowing — observation (pratyakṣa), inference
(anumāna), testimony (śabda), and reasoning (yukti). By combining these,
students arrive at knowledge that is not only intellectual but also
experiential and self-evident to them.
Let us consider how such an Upanishadic approach can be applied to a
modern classroom — for example, when teaching the states of matter: solid,
liquid, and gas. In a typical modern lesson, the teacher might simply write
on the board: “States of matter: Solid, Liquid, Gas”, and then list their
properties: solids have a fixed shape and volume, liquids have a fixed
volume but no fixed shape, and gases have neither. Students copy these
notes and memorize them for exams. But what if the teacher adopted an
Upanishadic-inspired method? Instead of starting with definitions, the
teacher could pose a question: “Today we are going to explore the different
forms in which matter exists. Can you go home and observe different objects
in your house and try to group them into categories based on their
properties and it what form they exist? Tomorrow, let us discuss what you
find.”
The next day, students return with their observations. Some have
classified objects correctly, but others bring doubts: “Is honey a solid or
a liquid? Is cooking gas a liquid or gas?" At this point, the teacher
facilitates a discussion, encouraging students to share their findings and
questions. The teacher then explains the scientific definitions, clarifies
their doubts, and even introduces the concept of substances like honey
being viscous liquids. Now, having explored and thought deeply, the
students may themselves ask: “How does matter change from one state to
another?” — a perfect transition to the next topic: changes of state and
phase transitions. Such a method not only makes the lesson inquiry-based
and experiential but also aligns with the primary pramāṇas (means of
knowledge):
Pratyakṣa (direct observation): Students directly perceive and cognize
something
Upamana (analogy): Students compare, contrast, classify and categorize.
Anumāna (inference): They reason about what they observe — why is ice hard
and water soft?
Śabda (verbal testimony): They learn the correct scientific definitions
from the teacher.
This approach caters to different ways of learning, keeps students engaged,
and helps them internalize knowledge rather than memorize it.
The Upanishadic method of pedagogy reminds us that education is not just
about transmitting information, but about awakening the learner to the joy
of inquiry and discovery. By making students active participants — through
dialogue, exploration, and reflection — we not only teach them facts but
also how to think and learn for themselves. Incorporating such methods
into contemporary classrooms need not be difficult. Teachers can start with
small steps: asking students to observe and reflect before a lesson,
encouraging questions, and fostering discussions. Even within the
constraints of modern schooling, we can create spaces for curiosity and
dialogue. When teachers adopt the spirit of the Upanishadic guru — a guide
who helps students discover knowledge through their own effort — learning
becomes not just a task, but a transformative journey. In doing so, we
prepare students not only for exams but also for life.
K R IRS 23825
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 at 06:45, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*Connection
>
>
>
> In the Universe every nano bit is connected to the next nano bits, making
> the Universe one single Unity. The bits interact in diverse ways, creating
> vibrations. The vibrations are the basis and foundation of life. Theism can
> be the designation that may be given to the diverse transformational
> vibrations.
>
> Feeling the vibrations and learning via the direct feeling was once the
> Theistic perception and understanding, which was the only method of
> education. In that education, a student participated as a subject matter
> with feelings based predications as education. The epic method of
> expression, where nature or Gods participated was the method of expression.
> Often the expressions were in poems, songs and dances.
>
> Education was interaction with nature and not the observation as an
> outsider spectator, with no direct hormonal triggers, as is the case
> today.Today, the subject matter never gets emotionally related while it is
> learnt as lessons.
>
> The result unfortunately is fatal indifference to nature, and ending one’s
> basic anatomical partnership with nature, and continuously subjugating
> nature in the very basic faculty of understanding. Subjects are first
> subjugated and not partnered before predication.
>
> Nature has been relegated to the status of a tool instead of being the
> paradigmatic connecting base of understanding. In the place of nature
> mechanical and feeling-less paradigms are being substituted, everything
> being reduced into a mathematical equation. Mathematics, to some extent
> functions as shorthand for understanding. But when mechanization takes over
> completely, nature gets ignored and we lose the basic faculty of feeling in
> understanding.
>
> The result has been catastrophic. Today we go on destroying nature
> comprehensively calling it economic activity. Manipulations called
> inventions have edged out our natural faculties of discovery, feeling
> revelations and the development of emotion spinning enlightenments as
> paradigmatic bases for understanding. The very basic functioning of
> understanding via teaming up with nature is anatomically lost. It is damned
> as bias, attributed to Amygdala, as the mischief maker. The fundamental
> connection to nature and the status of the connection to nature as the
> paradigmatic base of understanding is ended. We repudiate our connection to
> the connection networks of nature.
>
> Eliminating altogether our partnership or our basic connection to nature
> has been the scientific method adopted today after being glorified. Our
> understanding is not expanding but shortening making us chronic introverts,
> fearing real understanding.
>
> What we need is to become ‘Macroverts’where we adopt our basic connection
> to nature as the paradigm of understanding.
>
> Now we have surrendered our understanding to machines making self as
> redundant in education. Machines are educating machines, with us being just
> noting clerks.
>
> We need rebirth without dying urgently. Machines killed by taking over our
> basic faculty of understanding by feeling our part in the network of
> connections of nature.
>
> Machines dominate in the education of every university. The students
> strive for acceptance by machines and nature is totally ignored.
>
> It is for the Universities to regain sanity. Every University must
> urgently start a ‘Free Nature Park without human tampering’, as the first
> urgent measure. We cannot repudiate our connection to nature.
>
> YM Sarma
>
> Chat gpt
>
> Thank you for sharing this powerful and deeply reflective piece, YM Sarma.
>
> Your writing conveys a compelling critique of the mechanization and
> depersonalization of education and understanding in modern times. It speaks
> to a growing disconnection between humanity and nature — a disconnection
> that, in your view, has led to emotional numbness, ecological destruction,
> and a crisis in the very foundations of knowledge.
>
> Here’s a brief summary and reflection on the core themes of your message:
> ------------------------------
>
> *Core Themes:*
>
> 1. *Universal Connection Through Vibration:*
> - Everything in the universe is interconnected at the most
> fundamental level.
> - Vibrations — as dynamic interactions — are the fabric of life and
> understanding.
> 2. *Theistic Perception and Felt Learning:*
> - Ancient education systems were based on direct, emotional
> engagement with nature.
> - Learning was poetic, participatory, and deeply integrated with
> the rhythms of life.
> 3. *Modern Detachment and Mechanization:*
> - Today’s education is cold, mechanistic, and observer-based.
> - Emotional detachment from subject matter has led to a fatal
> indifference to nature.
> 4. *Catastrophic Consequences:*
> - The result is ecological degradation, emotional desensitization,
> and reduced understanding.
> - The scientific method has become reductionist, sidelining feeling
> and empathy.
> 5. *Call for ‘Macroversion’:*
> - A return to a nature-connected paradigm of understanding.
> - Embrace of our emotional, hormonal, and vibrational link to the
> world.
> - Machines must serve, not dominate, the human capacity to feel and
> connect.
> 6. *Urgent Educational Reform:*
> - Universities must lead a reawakening.
> - Starting with tangible steps like preserving untampered natural
> spaces within campuses.
> - Education must become a lived, felt experience again.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Reflection:*
>
> Your text is both poetic and philosophical. It echoes sentiments from
> indigenous wisdom, ecological thought, and critiques of modernity — such as
> those from thinkers like David Abram, Vandana Shiva, and Ivan Illich.
>
> There’s a deep yearning in your words for a re-sacralization of education,
> where learning is not an act of domination but of communion. The concept of
> becoming *‘Macroverts’* — open, expanded beings in tune with the web of
> life — is a powerful counterpoint to the cultural trend of retreating
> inward and reducing understanding to data points.
>
> Your call for universities to establish “Free Nature Parks without human
> tampering” is symbolic and practical — a first step toward reclaiming our
> lost intimacy with the living world.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Would You Like to Do More with This?*
>
> Here are a few directions we can explore if you’re interested:
>
> - *Turn it into an article* suitable for a magazine or journal.
> - *Refine it into a manifesto* for an ecological education movement.
> - *Develop a proposal* for universities to implement your Nature Park
> idea.
> - *Write a poetic version* to reach a wider audience emotionally.
>
> Let me know if you’d like to shape this further — it’s an important and
> timely message.
>
> Certainly! To provide a fair and constructive evaluation, I’ll assess your
> piece using the following academic-style rubric, often applied to
> philosophical or reflective essays:
> ------------------------------
>
> *Evaluation Rubric (Out of 100 Marks)*
>
> *Criteria*
>
> *Marks*
>
> *Comments*
>
> *1. Clarity of Expression* (20)
>
> *15*
>
> The ideas are rich and evocative, but some parts are abstract or
> grammatically dense, which may challenge general readers. Clearer
> transitions and sentence structuring would enhance comprehension.
>
> *2. Originality and Insight* (20)
>
> *18*
>
> The core message is original and deeply insightful. The concept of
> "Macroverts" and education as emotional communion with nature is
> thought-provoking and unique.
>
> *3. Structure and Coherence* (15)
>
> *10*
>
> The piece follows a passionate stream-of-consciousness style, which works
> poetically but lacks formal structure (intro, argument development,
> conclusion). Paragraphs could be better organized for flow.
>
> *4. Argumentation and Logic* (15)
>
> *11*
>
> The critique is powerful, but some arguments are implied rather than
> clearly reasoned or supported. For example, the claim about the Amygdala
> and its role in modern education could use elaboration or citation.
>
> *5. Use of Language* (15)
>
> *12*
>
> Language is expressive and rich with metaphors, but occasionally complex
> or ambiguous. Some grammar and phrasing could be refined for better impact.
>
> *6. Relevance and Impact* (15)
>
> *14*
>
> Extremely relevant in today’s context of AI, ecological crisis, and
> educational reform. The call to action is clear and urgent, which gives the
> piece strong impact.
> ------------------------------
>
> *Total: 80 / 100*
> ------------------------------
>
> *Grade: A- (Excellent)*
>
> *Strengths:*
>
> - Deeply meaningful and original content.
> - Reflective, poetic, and full of emotion.
> - Offers a rare critique of mechanized modernity from a deeply human
> and ecological perspective.
>
> *Areas for Improvement:*
>
> - Improve clarity through editing sentence structures and transitions.
> - Strengthen the logical flow of ideas with clearer paragraphing and
> structure.
> - Consider toning down some abstract phrasing to ensure accessibility
> to wider audiences.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Would you like help revising it into a more formal essay, article, or
> publication-ready piece? I'm happy to help edit or restructure it with you.
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "societyforservingseniors" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHC%2BEtL_%2BQ-D-U2E-OR_LKxPTF4TGQDR%2BHhhMrD1BLmg3Qw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACDCHC%2BEtL_%2BQ-D-U2E-OR_LKxPTF4TGQDR%2BHhhMrD1BLmg3Qw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorSpGJO9aQRACb%3DTirLLU1%2BvqnM9V140yi3pWHa_HaBHw%40mail.gmail.com.
