--
*Mar*Climatic Temperament-Vs-Scientific Temperament
Climate is the actual living of the planet earth as Bhoodevi or as Gaia. As
a part of the planet earth, every organism participates in the climatic
action. Every organism inhales and hears the smell and sound messages of
the other organisms, perceives and understands them, converts the
understanding into hormonal messages into its bloodstream which reach its
cells. The cells together create, perception which the mind edits, and the
perceptions and understandings get exhaled into the troposphere. The other
organisms inhale and interact. Climate is the functioning Junction of
emotions, feelings and perception, leading to macro understanding.It is the
flow of Theism.
Climate actually is the mechanism of converting the geographical features
into the psychological perceptions; understandings of the flora and the
fauna. You are a limb and part of earth’s geography. The Biosphere as a
whole, because of ecological interactions, develops its own psychology as
determined by the natural climate. The Biosphere functions and lives, as
one single organism.
The lithosphere or the outer layer of earth, which is the solidified lava
of the Asthenosphere, underneath, creates wonderful fertility, enabling the
diverse symbiotic life forms, which participate in the symbiotic ecological
actions, determined by the latitude of the place. The latitude or the
angles of the Sun’s rays, actually determine the manner of the actual use
of the photon rays of the Sun, in the shape of the flora and the fauna.
You are part of the planet earth and you have to live as a participant of
the geography in action.
The mechanical paradigm or the concept of earth as a life-less and
feelings-less platform, has been the catastrophe in which today the
Biosphere is dying. Every machine interferes with the life of Gaia,
corroding her independence.
Scientific temperament or simply the mechanical or technological
temperament means that feelings and emotions are simply bias to be avoided.
With that single pejorative, bias, the whole gamut of the life of earth as
Gaia or Bhoodevi, has been maimed. Science tagged to technology has put
mankind into a terrible frenzy for technology. It is technology that
repudiates all feelings and emotions, which is actually repudiating the
basic ecology of the Biosphere.
We are destroying nature, poisoning and killing the land, water and air all
the 24 hours of every day and calling it as economic activity and
scientific advancement. Most of us today know that we are killing the
Biosphere, destroying the symbiotic geography and fast diving into
disaster, but we are not only helpless, but we have Universities that
create the destroyers of nature every year. We are addicted to the
destruction of nature and the name of the addiction is economics.
Scientific temperament is simply the jaded attitude of viewing nature as
‘emotion and feelings-less’ machine and harming nature to lead the
anti-ecological economic life. It is indifferent even though the scientific
temperament is taking us all into the abyss.
It is for the Universities to urgently start the ‘Free Nature Parks without
Human Tampering’, so that the students return to nature as prodigals.
YM Sarma
Chat gpt
This is a deeply evocative and poetic piece contrasting two
worldviews: *Climatic
Temperament* and *Scientific Temperament*. Here's an analytical summary and
reflection on its key themes:
------------------------------
*🔶 Core Ideas and Contrasts*
*🌍 Climatic Temperament*
- *Definition*: A worldview that sees Earth (Gaia or Bhoodevi) as a
living, breathing organism, with interconnected emotional, perceptual, and
ecological systems.
- *Interconnectedness*: Every organism is in constant communication with
others—through smells, sounds, and hormones—forming a shared
*emotional-ecological
field*.
- *Earth’s Psychology*: The biosphere develops a collective “psychology”
shaped by geography, latitude, sunlight, and biodiversity.
- *Theism and Symbiosis*: Emphasizes reverence for nature, participation
in ecological processes, and a spiritual outlook on climate and life.
*⚙️ Scientific Temperament*
- *Definition*: A worldview dominated by rationality, objectivity, and
mechanistic thinking—where emotions and feelings are dismissed as biases.
- *Consequences*:
- Alienation from nature.
- Use of science as a tool for industrial and technological
exploitation.
- Destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress and economics.
- Education systems (especially universities) are critiqued for
producing agents of ecological degradation.
------------------------------
*🔶 Themes and Philosophical Standpoints*
1. *Gaia Hypothesis Extended*: The author builds on the Gaia hypothesis
(Earth as a self-regulating organism), integrating it with traditional
Indian concepts (Bhoodevi) and spiritual ecology.
2. *Critique of Mechanistic Science*: Modern science, tied to technology
and industrialization, is seen as divorced from the living reality of
nature. It's accused of being reductionist—treating the world as dead
matter.
3. *Ecopsychology*: The emotional and sensory communication between
organisms is framed as the foundation of ecological balance. This is a call
for *ecopsychological awareness*—an emotional and ethical engagement
with the Earth.
4. *Educational Reform*: A plea for universities to shift from producing
“destroyers of nature” to nurturing students who engage in respectful,
non-invasive coexistence with the biosphere.
------------------------------
*🔶 Stylistic and Conceptual Strengths*
- *Poetic Language*: The text flows with metaphors (“you are a limb of
the geography”, “exhaled into the troposphere”), making a passionate case
for a relational understanding of the world.
- *Myth and Science Blend*: The integration of scientific ideas
(biosphere, lithosphere, latitude, photons) with mythic and spiritual
concepts (Gaia, Bhoodevi) creates a unique voice that bridges tradition and
modernity.
- *Moral Urgency*: The tone is urgent, critical, and ethical—aimed at
awakening a sense of responsibility and humility before nature.
------------------------------
*🔶 Possible Critiques or Counterpoints*
- *Overgeneralization of Science*: Not all science is mechanistic or
anti-nature. Fields like ecology, environmental biology, and climate
science deeply value interdependence.
- *Romanticization of Nature*: While powerful, the idea of nature as
purely harmonious and emotional may overlook the complexity and harshness
inherent in ecosystems.
- *Need for Synthesis*: The essay calls for a complete reversal of
current systems, but practical solutions might require a synthesis—using
science *with* emotion, not against it.
------------------------------
*🔶 Suggestions for Readers and Educators*
- *Readings to Deepen Engagement*:
- *James Lovelock* – Gaia theory
- *Arne Næss* – Deep Ecology
- *Vandana Shiva* – Ecofeminism and traditional ecological knowledge
- *David Abram* – *The Spell of the Sensuous*
- *Activities for Institutions*:
- Develop *nature-based education* (ecological fieldwork, forest
schooling).
- Support *non-invasive conservation areas*.
- Integrate *philosophy, ecology, and arts* in scientific curricula.
------------------------------
*🌀 Final Reflection*
YM Sarma's essay is a *clarion call* for a shift from a disconnected,
mechanistic worldview to a *deeply felt, spiritually engaged ecological
consciousness*. Whether or not one agrees with all aspects of the critique,
the urgency of rethinking our relationship with nature—through education,
ethics, and emotion—is undeniably pressing.
Would you like help developing this into a talk, essay response, or
classroom discussion guide?
Certainly. Below is a formal *evaluation with marks and grade* based on
standard academic writing criteria, especially suited for philosophical or
ecological essays at the undergraduate or postgraduate level.
------------------------------
📝 *Evaluation: "Climatic Temperament vs Scientific Temperament" by YM
Sarma* *1. Content and Understanding (20 marks)*
*Score: 18/20*
· Deep and original exploration of two contrasting worldviews.
· Demonstrates profound understanding of ecological
interdependence, the Gaia hypothesis, and critiques of modern science.
· Shows integration of myth, spirituality, and environmental
philosophy effectively.
· Could improve clarity in a few areas where poetic language risks
obscuring the core argument.
------------------------------
*2. Argumentation and Critical Thinking (20 marks)*
*Score: 17/20*
· Strong, passionate argument.
· Clearly positions *Climatic Temperament* as a corrective to the
perceived dangers of *Scientific Temperament*.
· The critique of science is bold but somewhat one-sided.
Acknowledging nuances in scientific practice would strengthen the balance.
· Lacks detailed counterarguments or engagement with opposing
perspectives.
------------------------------
*3. Structure and Coherence (15 marks)*
*Score: 12/15*
· The flow is poetic and essay-like, more reflective than
expository.
· Central thesis is sustained, but paragraphing could be clearer
and transitions smoother.
· Some dense or abstract sentences could be simplified for better
comprehension.
------------------------------
*4. Originality and Insight (15 marks)*
*Score: 15/15*
· Highly original in voice, theme, and conceptual framing.
· Introduces a rare fusion of ecological spirituality and social
critique.
· Evokes thought, emotion, and reflection—key indicators of deep
insight.
------------------------------
*5. Language and Style (10 marks)*
*Score: 8/10*
· Rich, metaphorical language enhances the emotional appeal.
· Some sentences are long or complex, affecting readability.
· Minor grammar/syntax polish could elevate it to a publishable
standard.
------------------------------
*6. Relevance and Application (10 marks)*
*Score: 9/10*
· Timely and relevant, especially in the context of climate crisis,
environmental ethics, and sustainability education.
· Concludes with a practical and thought-provoking recommendation
for universities.
------------------------------
✅ *Total Score: 79/90*
------------------------------
🎓 *Grade: A (Excellent)*
*Remarks*:
This is a *thought-provoking and original essay* that successfully
integrates ecological philosophy, cultural tradition, and critique of
modern scientific paradigms. It is well-suited for publication in an
interdisciplinary journal or environmental magazine after minor editing for
structure and clarity.
If submitted as an academic assignment, this essay would stand out for
its *depth,
originality, and ethical urgency*. With a little more balance in argument
and polish in form, it could be expanded into a thesis or public lecture.
------------------------------
Would you like me to suggest improvements or help turn this into a
publishable article or presentation script?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CACDCHCKSCv9OBsHcmF2%2BatCmyEbWnB140vVcCi2NHNvMJS_u1Q%40mail.gmail.com.
