The Supreme Court has held that these three articles (14, 19, and 21) are
interconnected and form a "Golden Triangle," which provides comprehensive
protection to individual rights. Articles 14 and 21 are two fundamental
rights enshrined in the Indian Constitution. Article 14 guarantees the
right to equality before the law and equal protection of the laws, while
Article 21 protects the right to life and personal liberty. These two
articles, along with Article 19, are often referred to as the "Golden
Triangle" of the Indian Constitution, highlighting their fundamental
importance to individual rights and freedoms.
Yes ONLY IF INEQUALITY BEFORE LAW IS ESTABLISHED SC WILL RULE IN YOUR
FAVOUR; OR ELSE THERE ARE SO MANY CASES AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS FAILED BEFORE
THE APEX COURT. THE STATUTE AND THE RULES OF GOVERNANCE ARE DIFFERENT LIKE
SRUTI AND SMRITI. `
CONSTITUTIONALLY LAW IS FRAMED WHICH MAY BE CHALLENGED. EXECUTION
OF A PLAN ARE MADE ONLY AS RULES FIT ENOUGH IN THAT PRESENTI AND
RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED AS PER THE VERDICTS OF THE SC,
UNLESS THERE ARE /WERE EXCEPTIONAL RULES MADE THEN. BY GENERAL LAW IT IS
ALWAYS THERE THAT NO JUNIOR MAY DRAW MORE THAN THE SENIOR. BUT IT IS NOT
FOR THE GOVT TO GO THROUGH; BUT YOU HAVE TO SHOW THAT JUNIOR AND YOURSELF
WHERE THE BENEFITS ARE MORE FOR THE JUNIOR AND MAKE A CLAIM; THEN YOUR
ACCOUNTS DEPT WILL RAISE YOUR LEVEL. THUS RULES ARE FRAMED ONLY FOR A
PERIOD AND CANNOT BE STRETCHED TO YOUR ARMS’ LENGTHS. IF THERE IS
DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN 1930 BORN PENSIONER AND 1960 BORN PENSIONER, UNDER
RULES, IT IS NOT THE DISCRIMINATION BEFORE LAW. EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW,
CAN BE THWARTED BY AN ALPHABET IN YOUR CHARACTER ROLL WRITING. KARMA IS
THAT YOU ARE NOT EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW AND NOT OTHERWISE. SC MAY PASS ANY
ORDER IN THOSE SIX CASES AS WHAT WENT WRONG WE DO NOT KNOW; BUT THE
ORGANISATION HAS CASE TO DEFEND IS ALSO VITAL TO CONSIDER. COMPARISON IS
WITHIN THE COMPARABLE ONLY. K RAJARAM IRS 5825
On Tue, 5 Aug 2025 at 09:30, Colinjivadi Mahadevan <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Discrimination can exist between different organizations.But when exists
> within the same organization, there is definitely lack of equity and
> fairness which constitutes violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian
> Constitution. In a public sector organization governed by rules and
> regulations the concept of Karma cannot justify unconstitutional
> disparities.In case of LIC pensioners 6 Civil Appeals are pending before
> the Supreme Court and the final verdict from the Hon’ble Apex Court will
> determine the Karma of 5he affected LIC pensioners.
> C H Mahadevan
>
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2025, 07:50 Rajaram Krishnamurthy, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The write up I find is only an envious situation of an ordy person who
>> does not like the other minds. There were always differentiation and
>> discriminations and shall continue forever of which, no one can criticise,
>> since there is no comparison posts and employment. A police officer , an
>> Inspector of excise and customs can be killed while on duty and may serve
>> 24 by 7 but DO YOU PAY THEM DOUBLE YOUR SALARY while the LIC top man is
>> unknown and lives safely. A nurse who does all the worst services for the
>> worst patients holding her or him, which a doctor is supposed to do, gets
>> paid less than the doctors; why don't we triple the salary of the nurse?;
>> you will not agree. So whenever your ration goes down you will question
>> -HOW I'M DIFFERENT FROM HIM; but when you were drawing more than him, you
>> might say YOU ARE SUPERIOR IN SERVICE? So discrimination in the society
>> shall be there; even if there is a constitution it shall exist ; that is
>> Karma. WHERE THERE IS AN EVIDENCE THAT IN THE SAME DEPT JUNIOR DRAWING MORE
>> THAN THE SENIOR CAN APPLY AND SET IT RIGHT; BUT ONE CANNOT QUOTE IFS WITH
>> IRS IR IA&AS AND DEMAND EQUITY. SERVICE RULES ARE FRAMED IN SUCH A
>> MANNER THAT PAY COMMISSION MUST RESPECT ALL OF THEM. SO NO ONE CAN SAY WHAT
>> IS INEQUITY UNLESS FACTS ARE NOT BASED ON EQUITY WHICH IS A COURT
>> PROCEDURE. Another way, all union leaders must quit and shelve themselves
>> and then the whole scenario may be tried for a change. NO ONE CAN HAVE THE
>> CAKE AND EAT IT TOO. K RAJARAM IRS 5825
>>
>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 20:10, Colinjivadi Mahadevan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In case of Central Government pensioners and State Government
>>> pensioners, updated pension is being paid as per the recommendation of the
>>> latest Central Pay Commission Recommendations and the pension so updated
>>> is comparatively higher than similarly placed pensioners of Public Sector
>>> Banks and LIC and General Insurance Corporation and public sector General
>>> insurance companies. There are inter- cadre and intra- cadre disparities
>>> in pension.
>>> For example, an Executive Director of LIC ( who is just below the cadre
>>> of Managing Director of LIC) retired before 1/4/1993 is drawing a gross
>>> pension of Rs 39182 as on date while a Driver who retired after 1/8/2022
>>> gets Rs 41214. Interestingly family pensioners of deceased retirees of
>>> lower cadres in LIC are drawing more gross pension than pre-August 2002
>>> retiree -pensioners of higher cadres. This must be the situation in Public
>>> Sector Banks and General Insurance companies. In such a situation, granting
>>> extra benefits like for funeral expenses - which is a pittance-makes no
>>> sense.
>>> C H Mahadevan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 12:45 PM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Many more companies are there under staff welfare
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025, 12:36 Suryanarayana Ambadipudi, <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> SBI gives ₹ 30000 to pensioners towards funeral expenses
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *A.SURYANARAYANA*
>>>>> *The less you speak,the more you are listened to*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 11:05 AM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I read with interest. What is meant by extended benefit? Suppose I
>>>>>> don't own any house nor rent one and so AM UNABLE TO CLAIM DEDUCTION OF
>>>>>> HRA
>>>>>> then can i say it is differentiation? A law is passed and applicable
>>>>>> universally subject to qualifications. Because one cannot, law cannot be
>>>>>> abused. Banks cannot give as any deduction but as a welfare measure as
>>>>>> deductible out of their profit. So the Govt pension governed by the
>>>>>> Consolidated Fund of India and welfare measures of a company are totally
>>>>>> different. KR IRS 4825
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025 at 10:32, Colinjivadi Mahadevan <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recently State Bank of India and UCO Bank have announced the
>>>>>>> sanction of funeral expenses to the pensioners of their respective
>>>>>>> Banks.
>>>>>>> This is only an extended benefit beyond pension.
>>>>>>> C H Mahadevan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2025 at 9:41 AM Rajaram Krishnamurthy <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In that case differentiation is in pension and others. So. What
>>>>>>>> will apply to others alone should be claimed? Have nots are have
>>>>>>>> nots. So
>>>>>>>> haves cannot be envied.
>>>>>>>> K Rajaram IRS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 4 Aug 2025, 09:27 Surendra Varma, <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am not a pensioner, so I must at the outset admit that my views
>>>>>>>>> may not sink. So, my apologies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I personally believe that support from the government to those
>>>>>>>>> journeying to the door of death, whether pensioners or those who gave
>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>> sweat and blood to the country with no pension during their twilight
>>>>>>>>> years,
>>>>>>>>> is more important than covering their funeral expenses.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What is it that makes a pensioner superior and entitled to funeral
>>>>>>>>> expenses covered by the government, but not an inferior
>>>>>>>>> non-pensioner. They
>>>>>>>>> both die as human beings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Among HIndus, as I understand from my senior family members,
>>>>>>>>> covering the entire cremation expenses of a loved one in the family is
>>>>>>>>> considered a sacred duty (punya in Hindi), and an offer from the
>>>>>>>>> government
>>>>>>>>> to cover the funeral expenses is seen as an insu.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here, in the U.S.I am currently visiting,I understand there are
>>>>>>>>> funeral insurance plans for people to buy to cover their funeral
>>>>>>>>> expenses.
>>>>>>>>> The piece of the land they will be buried in, is called a plot (in
>>>>>>>>> India a
>>>>>>>>> plot means a piece of land on which a house stands!) and must be
>>>>>>>>> bought in
>>>>>>>>> a cemetery by the dead before his death or his family when he dies. A
>>>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>>>> funeral procedure here with no fanfare costs US$ 5000 (Rs 432,500
>>>>>>>>> approx.).
>>>>>>>>> Why can't we introduce such an insurance plan, open to all, including
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> pensioners.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Why should there be a distinction between haves and have nots in
>>>>>>>>> India even in the crematoriums, let alone in temples?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Suren
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 2 Aug 2025 at 02:06, Suryanarayana Ambadipudi <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> National Coordination Committee of Pensioners Associations
>>>>>>>>>> (NCCPA) CHQ
>>>>>>>>>> No.NCCPA /Funeral Exp Dated 01.08.2025
>>>>>>>>>> To
>>>>>>>>>> The Honourable Prime Minister
>>>>>>>>>> Government of India
>>>>>>>>>> New Delhi – 110001
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sir;
>>>>>>>>>> Sub: Request for grant of Funeral Expenses to Pensioners and
>>>>>>>>>> Staff of Government – regarding.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The NCCPA CHQ wish to submit this request for funeral expenses to
>>>>>>>>>> Pensioners for your kind and sympathetic consideration.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is definitely not out of place to mention that the Andhra
>>>>>>>>>> Pradesh State Government is paying the funeral expenses of Rs,10,000
>>>>>>>>>> to all
>>>>>>>>>> Pensioners and Family Pensioners on their death. The Tamilnadu State
>>>>>>>>>> Government is paying a sum of Rs.50,000 as Family Relief Fund to the
>>>>>>>>>> dying
>>>>>>>>>> Pensioners on recovery of 80/- per month from Pensioners.
>>>>>>>>>> Recently on 23.07.2025, the UCO Bank has ordered a sum of
>>>>>>>>>> Rs.20,000 to the family member of the dying staff to meet the funeral
>>>>>>>>>> expenses accepting the recommendation of the Staff Welfare Committee.
>>>>>>>>>> Thus the payment made is absolutely essential to bury or cremate
>>>>>>>>>> the senior citizen honourably.
>>>>>>>>>> The Central Government is void of any such scheme to pay the
>>>>>>>>>> family member of the dying pensioner any sum as Funeral Expenses. The
>>>>>>>>>> concerned Staff Welfare Committees functioning in some departments
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>> worry only about the serving staff but not the family condition of
>>>>>>>>>> Pensioners, which is pathetic in most cases.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The NCCPA CHQ requests the Honourable Prime Minister to consider
>>>>>>>>>> the plight of the family of the Pensioners and the need to bury or
>>>>>>>>>> cremate
>>>>>>>>>> honourably the dead bodies of senior citizens, and grant adequate
>>>>>>>>>> sum from
>>>>>>>>>> the consolidated fund of India as ‘Funeral Expenses’. The NCCPA and
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> community of Pensioners will remain grateful to you for your
>>>>>>>>>> benevolent act.
>>>>>>>>>> With Regards.
>>>>>>>>>> Yours Faithfully,
>>>>>>>>>> Sd/- (K.Ragavendran)
>>>>>>>>>> Secretary General, NCCPA
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *A.SURYANARAYANA*
>>>>>>>>>> *The less you speak,the more you are listened to*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "societyforservingseniors" group.
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>>> send an email to
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion, visit
>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CAFBx%3DOcP0PXv-M0eDMdSH%3DSQTH0cmUMm_mmr883BK9erRcpVpQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CAFBx%3DOcP0PXv-M0eDMdSH%3DSQTH0cmUMm_mmr883BK9erRcpVpQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups "societyforservingseniors" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to
>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion, visit
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACgBxSozY5Wzj8tkP2vBE%3Djr-yTcAT355mzrF%3DHJDHNpRFSuew%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/society4servingseniors/CACgBxSozY5Wzj8tkP2vBE%3Djr-yTcAT355mzrF%3DHJDHNpRFSuew%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo0kPANqM7GJnJmXtaBSNu%3DV-_fxm45000FGuUZnmRZZw%40mail.gmail.com.
