On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 02:46:26AM -0400, Daniel Dickman wrote: > [...] > > Should we add defines for the 286 too?
I do not think OpenBSD ever ran on 286, right? Adding defines for 286 would thus be rather pointless. Keeping some #define lines is easier than explaining every now and then why numbers defined start from, say, 3 or 5, why 0 should not be redefined and so on - well I do not know, maybe it should be reused. There will be more such unsupported architectures and cpus and more defines will become obsolete. So I personally would have kept those lines and not have to explain or keep saying "read it in the docs". At the same time, ok, perhaps nobody will really care about such details. I might be wrong about it. -- Regards, Tomasz Rola -- ** A C programmer asked whether computer had Buddha's nature. ** ** As the answer, master did "rm -rif" on the programmer's home ** ** directory. And then the C programmer became enlightened... ** ** ** ** Tomasz Rola mailto:tomasz_r...@bigfoot.com **
