> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:59:06 +1100
> From: Jonathan Gray <j...@jsg.id.au>
> 
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:33:18AM +0100, Patrick Wildt wrote:
> > Am Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:56:16AM +1100 schrieb Jonathan Gray:
> > > Add a driver for "simple-pm-bus" a way to enable a clock and/or
> > > power domain for a group of devices.
> > > 
> > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/simple-pm-bus.txt
> > > 
> > > This is needed to use am335x/omap4 dtbs from linux 5.11.
> > 
> > "A Simple Power-Managed Bus is a transparent bus that doesn't need a real
> > driver, as it's typically initialized by the boot loader."
> > 
> > That's a bit funny though. :-)  But I think they meant "it doesn't need
> > a real driver, apart from the generic simple-pm-bus driver".
> > 
> > 
> > > Index: sys/dev/fdt/files.fdt
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/fdt/files.fdt,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.146
> > > diff -u -p -r1.146 files.fdt
> > > --- sys/dev/fdt/files.fdt 5 Feb 2021 00:05:20 -0000       1.146
> > > +++ sys/dev/fdt/files.fdt 17 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0000
> > > @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ device simplepanel
> > >  attach   simplepanel at fdt
> > >  file     dev/fdt/simplepanel.c           simplepanel
> > >  
> > > +device   simplepmbus: fdt
> > > +attach   simplepmbus at fdt
> > > +file     dev/fdt/simplepmbus.c           simplepmbus
> > > +
> > >  device   sxiccmu
> > >  attach   sxiccmu at fdt
> > >  file     dev/fdt/sxiccmu.c               sxiccmu
> > > Index: share/man/man4/Makefile
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/share/man/man4/Makefile,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.792
> > > diff -u -p -r1.792 Makefile
> > > --- share/man/man4/Makefile       4 Feb 2021 16:25:38 -0000       1.792
> > > +++ share/man/man4/Makefile       17 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0000
> > > @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ MAN=    aac.4 abcrtc.4 abl.4 ac97.4 acphy.4
> > >   rl.4 rlphy.4 route.4 rsu.4 rtsx.4 rum.4 run.4 rtw.4 rtwn.4 \
> > >   safe.4 safte.4 sbus.4 schsio.4 scsi.4 sd.4 \
> > >   sdmmc.4 sdhc.4 se.4 ses.4 sf.4 sili.4 \
> > > - simpleamp.4 simpleaudio.4 simplefb.4 simplepanel.4 siop.4 sis.4 sk.4 \
> > > + simpleamp.4 simpleaudio.4 simplefb.4 simplepanel.4 simplepmbus.4 \
> > > + siop.4 sis.4 sk.4 \
> > >   sm.4 smsc.4 softraid.4 spdmem.4 sdtemp.4 speaker.4 sppp.4 sqphy.4 \
> > >   ssdfb.4 st.4 ste.4 stge.4 sti.4 stp.4 sv.4 switch.4 sxiccmu.4 \
> > >   sxidog.4 sximmc.4 sxipio.4 sxipwm.4 sxirsb.4 sxirtc.4 sxisid.4 \
> > > Index: sys/arch/armv7/conf/GENERIC
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/armv7/conf/GENERIC,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.134
> > > diff -u -p -r1.134 GENERIC
> > > --- sys/arch/armv7/conf/GENERIC   4 Feb 2021 16:25:39 -0000       1.134
> > > +++ sys/arch/armv7/conf/GENERIC   17 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0000
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ config          bsd     swap generic
> > >  # The main bus device
> > >  mainbus0 at root
> > >  simplebus*       at fdt?
> > > +simplepmbus*     at fdt?
> > >  cpu0             at mainbus?
> > >  
> > >  # Cortex-A9
> > > Index: sys/arch/armv7/conf/RAMDISK
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/arch/armv7/conf/RAMDISK,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.119
> > > diff -u -p -r1.119 RAMDISK
> > > --- sys/arch/armv7/conf/RAMDISK   18 Jun 2020 08:48:04 -0000      1.119
> > > +++ sys/arch/armv7/conf/RAMDISK   17 Feb 2021 00:49:02 -0000
> > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ config          bsd root on rd0a swap on rd0b
> > >  mainbus0 at root
> > >  softraid0        at root
> > >  simplebus*       at fdt?
> > > +simplepmbus*     at fdt?
> > >  cpu0             at mainbus?
> > >  
> > >  # Cortex-A9
> > > --- /dev/null     Wed Feb 17 11:49:05 2021
> > > +++ sys/dev/fdt/simplepmbus.c     Tue Feb 16 17:24:55 2021
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> > > +/*       $OpenBSD$       */
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2021 Jonathan Gray <j...@openbsd.org>
> > > + *
> > > + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any
> > > + * purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
> > > + * copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
> > > + *
> > > + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL 
> > > WARRANTIES
> > > + * WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
> > > + * MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHOR BE LIABLE 
> > > FOR
> > > + * ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES
> > > + * WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN
> > > + * ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT 
> > > OF
> > > + * OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <sys/param.h>
> > > +#include <sys/device.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include <machine/fdt.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include <dev/ofw/openfirm.h>
> > > +#include <dev/ofw/ofw_clock.h>
> > > +#include <dev/ofw/ofw_power.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include <arm/simplebus/simplebusvar.h>
> > 
> > Maybe like this, was we have in rkpinctrl?
> > 
> > #ifdef __armv7__
> > #include <arm/simplebus/simplebusvar.h>
> > #else
> > #include <arm64/dev/simplebusvar.h>
> > #endif
> 
> The known arm64 usage is quite small. The only use in
> 5.11 linux/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ is qcom/msm8996.dtsi
> 
> Though it would be nice if a machine include could be used without the
> ifdef for cases like this in general.
> 
> > 
> > Generally I was wondering if we shouldn't just add this to simplebus.c
> > itself?  You'd need to add a compatible to the match function, and in
> > the attach function you'd need to check for the compatible and then
> > do
> > 
> >     power_domain_enable(faa->fa_node);
> >     clock_enable_all(faa->fa_node);
> > 
> > in the if-block.
> > 
> > Haven't made my mind up yet what I like better, maybe kettenis@ has an
> > opinion.
> 
> The binding text has
> 
> 'While "simple-pm-bus" follows the "simple-bus" set of properties,
> as specified in the Devicetree Specification, it is not an extension
> of "simple-bus".'

Ceci n'est pas pas une "simple-bus"!

Not sure what they're smoking, but for all practical purpose it is an
extensions of "simple-bus".  Maybe there are some subtle differences
related to power-management.  But we don't do any of that on OpenBSD
yet.  But yes I think putting the functionality in simplebus(4) would
make sense.

Reply via email to