On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 04:30:06PM -0500, Andras Farkas wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:
> > hi.
> >
> > it's an oversight on my part - the posix page for pr renders poorly on
> > lynx, and -p is difficult to spot. i have added a note to say that -p is
> > unsupported. if anyone chooses to add support, we can easily fix it.
> I see!
> Was the diff I sent adding -p support not good?  Or is -p just
> something undesired in general?  Just trying to understand and learn
> from this.
> 
> > i also took the typo fix for pr.c.
> Thanks!
> 

hi.

i don't code or use pr myself, so i'm a poor judge of that part of your
diff. i didn;t hear any feedback about a desire to add it, so i decided
to fix the man page with the view that it'd be trivial to undo that part
if at some stage we want pr to have the -p option.

perhaps other people will comment on those aspects.

jmc

Reply via email to