On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 10:40 AM Jason McIntyre <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > hi. > > it's an oversight on my part - the posix page for pr renders poorly on > lynx, and -p is difficult to spot. i have added a note to say that -p is > unsupported. if anyone chooses to add support, we can easily fix it. I see! Was the diff I sent adding -p support not good? Or is -p just something undesired in general? Just trying to understand and learn from this.
> i also took the typo fix for pr.c. Thanks!
