Klemens Nanni <k...@openbsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:43:21PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote: > > It doesn't make sense to allow the user to simultaneously set -n > > (never time out) and also set -t timeout (release the terminal after > > timeout minutes). > Makes sense but the synopsis should probably stay the same. You could > simply print usage like chmod(8) or explicitly state their mutual > exclusiveness in an error message like pfctl(8) does. I prefer the > former here.
I agree on that. Being excessively precise with nested [] can be annoying and hide the simple case.
