Re: lock(1): make -n and -t options mutually exclusive

[Klemens Nanni]

On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 12:43:21PM -0500, Scott Cheloha wrote:
> It doesn't make sense to allow the user to simultaneously set -n
> (never time out) and also set -t timeout (release the terminal after
> timeout minutes).
Makes sense but the synopsis should probably stay the same.  You could
simply print usage like chmod(8) or explicitly state their mutual
exclusiveness in an error message like pfctl(8) does.  I prefer the
former here.