On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 01:43:59AM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > On 23 November 2016 at 01:42, Alexander Bluhm <alexander.bl...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:44:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: > >> OK, all I wanted to know was if this is know to work and if it has > >> been tested. I'd argue that we don't put the code that doesn't work > >> or not tested or we don't know what it does :) > > > > After looking at all the cases, it will be hard to test the at-to > > with route-to combinations. As the feature never worked, let's > > disable it. If someone has a usecase, he can put it back. > > > > ok? > > > > bluhm > > > > I agree. If someone makes it work and gets it tested, > we can consider including the code.
no objection here too. I like bluhm's patch.
