On 23 November 2016 at 01:42, Alexander Bluhm <alexander.bl...@gmx.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 01:44:09PM +0100, Mike Belopuhov wrote: >> OK, all I wanted to know was if this is know to work and if it has >> been tested. I'd argue that we don't put the code that doesn't work >> or not tested or we don't know what it does :) > > After looking at all the cases, it will be hard to test the at-to > with route-to combinations. As the feature never worked, let's > disable it. If someone has a usecase, he can put it back. > > ok? > > bluhm >
I agree. If someone makes it work and gets it tested, we can consider including the code.
