On 2014/07/11 05:05, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 09:56, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > On 2014/07/11 18:51, Brett Mahar wrote: > >> On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:48:12 +0100 > >> Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote: > >> > >> | On 2014/07/11 01:18, Theo de Raadt wrote: > >> | > > I too use gopher in lynx regularly, and would miss support. There > > is = > >> | > > still a surprisingly active community using gopher. (floodgap, et > > al.) > >> | > > >> | > So install a package. > >> | > >> | Should we just move lynx to packages? > >> | > >> > >> I find lynx really handy to have in base, e.g. installing on a new > > machine, users can just go to openbsd.org and cut and paste a pkg_path > > prior to installing anything, and read the faq. > >> > >> Using openbsd for the first time would have been a lot more painful > > without a browser in base. > >> > > > > Thing is, if we need another version of lynx in packages to support > > gopher, having one in base as well just gets confusing.. > > No more than many versions of gcc in base and ports, I think. We could > call it elynx. :)
Yes, that's confusing too, especially with nginx. > We have documentation in html format, so I think we need a basic text > browser in base to view it. BIND, Lynx itself, Sendmail milters, ncurses.
