On 2014/07/11 18:51, Brett Mahar wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 09:48:12 +0100 > Stuart Henderson <st...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > | On 2014/07/11 01:18, Theo de Raadt wrote: > | > > I too use gopher in lynx regularly, and would miss support. There is = > | > > still a surprisingly active community using gopher. (floodgap, et al.) > | > > | > So install a package. > | > | Should we just move lynx to packages? > | > > I find lynx really handy to have in base, e.g. installing on a new machine, > users can just go to openbsd.org and cut and paste a pkg_path prior to > installing anything, and read the faq. > > Using openbsd for the first time would have been a lot more painful without a > browser in base. >
Thing is, if we need another version of lynx in packages to support gopher, having one in base as well just gets confusing..
