Gregor you would perhaps get better feedback if it were easier to discern where your patches are and what each one is doing. If you can't be inclined to keep the subjects matching the diffs and are sending stuff out with subjects like "scheduler improvement diff X" instead of something like "reduce time slice length by 50%" it makes it a lot more effort for someone to read and test. On Oct 14, 2012 9:01 AM, "Gregor Best" <g...@ring0.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 11:05:36AM +0200, David Coppa wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Gregor Best <g...@ring0.de> wrote: > > > This patch simply halves the timeslice processes get until they are > > > preempted. This patch is standalone and the rest of the patches does > not > > > depend on it, but I figured I'd throw it in anyway. > > > > > > -- > > > Gregor Best > > > > > > > Didn't get this patch. Is it me or the patch is missing? > > > > The patch was the message my mail was in reply to. There's no Patch 2/5 > subject line because I forgot to change that after sending out Patch > 1/5. > > -- > Gregor Best
