On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 15:07, Jérémie Courrèges-Anglas wrote: > If the licence seems ok, why not just pull a complete tinyscheme instance, > that would then be usable from other applications? (tinyscheme doesn't seem > to > be in ports).
I don't want to be in the business of adding 20 different interpreters to base. If I did, it'd be lua first by a mile. That said, tinyscheme is designed to be directly embedded. If it turns out people are dying to add scheme support to top and systat, we can talk about a shared library, but global changes are way far more involved.
