Thoughts, since we have been down this road before.

1. You can remap keys, in your ~/.mg file

2. I should point out that all of mg (other than theo.c) is currently
PUBLIC DOMAIN, not merely BSD, so this change is significant, license-wise.
Please be pedantic about including licenses.

3. Why scheme? Yes, emacs uses Lisp. But seriously, so? Why not just add,
say, perl bindings?

4. Seriously, please be pedantic about licenses. Part of me dies when we
see a new source file without one.

I'm all for adding support for scripting into mg, though I would be tempted
to rip out all nonessential functionality first (ng? ;) and add it back via
the scripting language. I would think the goal should be to make mg
significantly *smaller* any such change

-kj





On Thursday, June 28, 2012, Loganaden Velvindron wrote:

> If Jasper is going to take care of it, why not :-) ?
>
> I'd like to get the ability to remap keys, without hacking src.
>
> (As an mg user)
>
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Mark Lumsden 
> <m...@showcomplex.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >> Here is an updated diff for mg with tinyscheme integration. It's based
> on
> >> tedu's original diff with various tweaks and changes. For those worried
> about
> >> mg being too bloated, rest assured, it's still small and lean and a big
> part
> >> smaller than vi ;-)
> >> It's not fully possible to turn mg into your mail client, but I'd like
> to commit
> >> this diff and work on it futher in tree (not the mail-client thing,
> that would
> >> bloat mg and that's far from desired).
> >>
> >> Includes some fixes by lum@ and Sunil Nimmagadda too.
> >>
> >> Diff is also at http://crappydiffs.org/tinyschemg.diff
> >>
> >
> > I would appreciate some feedback on the inclusion of this diff in mg
> > since I am unlikely to use tinyscheme myself but can see why others
> > would like it added. Are there are strong feelings about it either
> > way?
> >
> > -lum
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Brightest day,
> Blackest night,
> No bug shall escape my sight,
> And those who worship evil's mind,
> be wary of my powers,
> puffy lantern's light !

Reply via email to