On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:15:56PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > I tested the patch briefly and it seems to work fine BUT I'm not sure > > why this is a good idea. You're mapping keys that do other things in > > Emacs (esp. C-o but also C-t and even C-w which can be used if the > > dired buffer is made non-read-only in Emacs). > > When the change is simple, mg should behave like emacs. > > Sometimes it will be different because it is a simpler editor. But > it should not go out of the way to be different.
Yeah, this doesn't seem like a difference due to simplicity. It would be just as simple to wrap next-line and previous-line to replicate the Emacs behaviour. Cheers, -Nima -- The pudding is in the proof.
