On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:54:20PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jason McIntyre <j...@cava.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
> >> > 2. Diff is attached.
> >> >
> >>
> >> i've looked at the rfc, and {net,free}bsd man pages, and am clueless.
> >> would any other developer like to comment on this?
> >>
> >> jmc
> >>
> >
> > that looks like a no, then. so, andreas, no change to be made unless
> > someone takes an interest in this.
> >
> > jmc
> >
> 
> oops. ok for the manpage change, as it's indeed of the ``paramprob'' type:
> 
> #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_HEADER          0       /* erroneous header field */
> #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_NEXTHEADER      1       /* unrecognized next header
> */
> #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_OPTION          2       /* unrecognized option */
> 

cool, thanks for looking.

> can't comment on the pf keyword addition though.
> 

what pf keyword addition?

jmc

> >> > According to the (informational) RFC 4890 this kind of icmp6 message
> >> > must not be dropped for the correct functioning of IPv6. Is there a key
> >> > word planned for this icmp6 code which could be used in PF?
> >> >
> >> > Best regards,
> >> > Andreas
> >> > Index: share/man/man4/icmp6.4
> >> > ===================================================================
> >> > RCS file: /usr/cvsync/cvs/src/share/man/man4/icmp6.4,v
> >> > retrieving revision 1.23
> >> > diff -u -r1.23 icmp6.4
> >> > --- share/man/man4/icmp6.4  8 Dec 2009 07:57:57 -0000       1.23
> >> > +++ share/man/man4/icmp6.4  7 May 2011 19:05:11 -0000
> >> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
> >> >  .It 1 Ta reassemb Ta timex Ta "Time exceeded in reassembly"
> >> >  .It 0 Ta badhead Ta paramprob Ta "Erroneous header field"
> >> >  .It 1 Ta nxthdr Ta paramprob Ta "Unrecognized next header"
> >> > -.It 2 Ta "" Ta redir Ta "Unrecognized option"
> >> > +.It 2 Ta "" Ta paramprob Ta "Unrecognized option"
> >> >  .It 0 Ta redironlink Ta redir Ta "Redirection to on-link node"
> >> >  .It 1 Ta redirrouter Ta redir Ta "Redirection to better router"
> >> >  .El

Reply via email to