On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Jason McIntyre <j...@cava.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 08:27:31AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
>> On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 09:29:21PM +0200, Andreas Bartelt wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I've noticed a typo in the icmp6(4) man page regarding icmp6 type 4 code
>> > 2. Diff is attached.
>> >
>>
>> i've looked at the rfc, and {net,free}bsd man pages, and am clueless.
>> would any other developer like to comment on this?
>>
>> jmc
>>
>
> that looks like a no, then. so, andreas, no change to be made unless
> someone takes an interest in this.
>
> jmc
>oops. ok for the manpage change, as it's indeed of the ``paramprob'' type: #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_HEADER 0 /* erroneous header field */ #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_NEXTHEADER 1 /* unrecognized next header */ #define ICMP6_PARAMPROB_OPTION 2 /* unrecognized option */ can't comment on the pf keyword addition though. >> > According to the (informational) RFC 4890 this kind of icmp6 message >> > must not be dropped for the correct functioning of IPv6. Is there a key >> > word planned for this icmp6 code which could be used in PF? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Andreas >> > Index: share/man/man4/icmp6.4 >> > =================================================================== >> > RCS file: /usr/cvsync/cvs/src/share/man/man4/icmp6.4,v >> > retrieving revision 1.23 >> > diff -u -r1.23 icmp6.4 >> > --- share/man/man4/icmp6.4 8 Dec 2009 07:57:57 -0000 1.23 >> > +++ share/man/man4/icmp6.4 7 May 2011 19:05:11 -0000 >> > @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ >> > .It 1 Ta reassemb Ta timex Ta "Time exceeded in reassembly" >> > .It 0 Ta badhead Ta paramprob Ta "Erroneous header field" >> > .It 1 Ta nxthdr Ta paramprob Ta "Unrecognized next header" >> > -.It 2 Ta "" Ta redir Ta "Unrecognized option" >> > +.It 2 Ta "" Ta paramprob Ta "Unrecognized option" >> > .It 0 Ta redironlink Ta redir Ta "Redirection to on-link node" >> > .It 1 Ta redirrouter Ta redir Ta "Redirection to better router" >> > .El
