On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:00:27 +0200
Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdt...@bsws.de> wrote:
> * Gregory Edigarov <g...@bestnet.kharkov.ua> [2010-08-25 11:03]:
> > There is something I never understand: why change more for less?
> > i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature for
> > nsd/unbound, that doesn't have 2/3 of bind features.
>
> because bind is a misdesigned piece of shit.
>
well, I can understand it, but, then why only nsd to the base, and not
unbound?
--
With best regards,
Gregory Edigarov
