On 2010/08/25 11:57, Gregory Edigarov wrote: > On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:30:25 +0200 > Jakob Schlyter <ja...@openbsd.org> wrote: > > > On 23 aug 2010, at 04.16, patrick keshishian wrote: > > > > > Is the idea to replace bind altogether from base? If so, my initial > > searching shows NSD doesn't support caching nor views (although, my > > googling skills suck). Are these being considered? > > > > The plan is that Unbound will be imported as a caching recursive name > > server. Neither of them has support for views and I have no intention > > of retrofitting that. > > > > jakob > > > There is something I never understand: why change more for less? > i.e. why change bind which is feature reach and mature
mature - eh? they keep rewriting it... here's the latest incarnation: http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/GettingStartedBIND10Development
