> > I do agree that instead of a /proc entry, we should check for a kenrel
> > version >= X where X is the upstream version that first started
> > supporting all the features needed by libpcap for vlan filtering. This
> > is not a compile time check but a run time one. Does anyone see any
> > issues with this? Is there any long term implications of this, like if
> > you backport patches to an older long term supported kernel? Are there
> > other better ways to do this, like may be returning feature bits from
> > an ioctl call? This is something we need to deal with on a continuous
> > basis as we keep supporting newer AUX fields and libpcap and other
> > user land code needs to make use of it. At the same time, they need to
> > handle backward compatibility issues with older kernels.
>
> As Eric mentioned earlier, for now there seems not to be a reliable
> way to get to know which ops are present and which not. It's not
> really nice, but if you want to make use of those new (ANC*) features,
> probably checking kernel version might be the only way if I'm not
> missing something. Now net-next is closed, but if it reopens, I'll
> submit a version 2 of my patch where you've been CC'd to. If it gets
> in, then at least it's for sure that since kernel <xyz> this kind of
> feature test is present.
How are you going to tell whether a feature is present in a non-Linux
kernel ?
Testing kernel versions is somewhat suboptimal as support
could be patched into a much older kernel (maybe not for
this but ...)
David
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
