On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 14:36 -0800, Ani Sinha wrote:
> >
> > It is possible to test for the presence of support of the new vlan bpf
> > extensions by attempting to load a filter that uses them. As only valid
> > filters can be loaded, old kernels that do not support filtering of vlan
> > tags will fail to load the a test filter with uses them.
>
> Unfortunately I do not see this. The sk_chk_filter() does not have a
> default in the case statement and the check will not detect an unknown
> instruction. It will fail when the filter is run and as far as I can see,
> the packet will be dropped. Something like this might help?
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index c23543c..96338aa 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -548,6 +548,8 @@ int sk_chk_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned
> int flen)
> return -EINVAL;
> /* Some instructions need special checks */
> switch (code) {
> + /* for unknown instruction, return EINVAL */
> + default : return -EINVAL;
> case BPF_S_ALU_DIV_K:
> /* check for division by zero */
> if (ftest->k == 0)
This patch is wrong.
Check lines 546, 547, 548 where we do the check for unknown instructions
code = codes[code];
if (!code)
return -EINVAL;
If you want to test ANCILLARY possible values, its already too late, as
old kernels wont use any patch anyway.
_______________________________________________
tcpdump-workers mailing list
tcpdump-workers@lists.tcpdump.org
https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
