Daniele Orlandi wrote:
Yes, I agree, in facts I forgot that I was already using DLT_LINUX_LAPD. I would go with DLT_LINUX_LAPD,
OK, I've checked in a change to make it DLT_LINUX_LAPD. Presumably the theory is that either
1) vISDN will be the only ISDN-for-Linux that supports D-channel packet capture (either because nobody else bothers or because vISDN displaces all other ISDN-for-Linux implementations :-))
or
2) other ISDN-for-Linux should, if they support D-channel packet capture, use the same header just to avoid extra complication.
-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
