Hi, On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 08:34:44PM -0500, Michael Richardson wrote: > Gert, the problem with the anoncvs was that it got into situations where > there was a cvs --pserver running (often four or five) with no network > socket attached (I guess it closed down), consuming 100% of the CPU on > the box. [..] > So, I restricted the cvs pserver in hosts.allow, since I suspected that > it might have been people abusing the service.
Yes, this explains things (it *did* look like a TCP wrapper :) ), and I know the situation "I need to do something about this open source project's web server" all too well... > If you (or anyone else) wants to send their IP address, I can insert it > into hosts.allow. I'll even take /24s if you don't have a static. Please add 193.149.48.160/27 for me (Gert Doering, [EMAIL PROTECTED]). This /27 is statically assigned to me, and I use various machines out of the network to do testing on Linux, NetBSD, etc. thanks, gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED] fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.