On Mon, 29.06.15 16:19, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson ([email protected]) wrote:
> >Who writes/maintains the code that parses "nofail" in /etc/fstab ? > >Who writes/maintains the typical system boot code (whatever has replaced > >rc.sysinit) ? > > > >I suspect the answer to both is the systemd maintainers, in which case > >is this not the correct place to bitch about it ? > > util-linux ( see man mount ) is what provides the nofail option and I dont > follow what you mean by getting the behaviour to modify it back to sensible > since systemd does already do what is sensible to do and always has. Well, that's not the full story. systemd interprets nofail, and builds on the semantics that util-linux defines, but expands on them. Hence, yes, we do take blame for the change of behaviour, but I am sure it's the right thing to do. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
