On Mon, 29.06.15 16:01, jon ([email protected]) wrote: > On Mon, 2015-06-29 at 14:21 +0000, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > > On 06/29/2015 02:08 PM, jon wrote: > > > https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#systemd-upgrade-default-init-system > > > > > > I just installed debian 8.1, on the whole my reaction is mixed, one > > > thing however really pisses me off more than any other > > > > > > "5.6.1. Stricter handling of failing mounts during boot under systemd" > > > > > > This is not "Stricter" it is a change in default behaviour. > > > > > > This change is a shit idea, who do I shout at to get the behaviour > > > modified to back to sensible ? > > > > > > > The systemd community only recommends what downstream consumers of it > > should do but does not dictate or othewise decided anything how those > > consumers eventually decide to implement systemd so if you dont like how > > systemd is implemented in Debian you should voice your concerns with the > > Debian community. > Ok > > Who writes/maintains the code that parses "nofail" in /etc/fstab ? > Who writes/maintains the typical system boot code (whatever has replaced > rc.sysinit) ? > > I suspect the answer to both is the systemd maintainers, in which case > is this not the correct place to bitch about it ?
One more mail like this and you will be moderated. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
