Ross Lagerwall wrote on 14/01/15 22:41: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:04:35PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: >> В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:07 +0000 >> Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> пишет: >> >>> >>> Anyway, assuming the process is in the .mount unit cgroup, should >>> systemd detect the umount and kill the processes accordingly, and if >> >> It does not do it currently. It only starts killing if (u)mount times >> out. Otherwise if umount is successful it goes to stopped state >> immediately. Although it probably should, even for the sake of user >> space helpers. >> >>> not, should calling "systemctl status" on .mount units show processes >>> even if it's in an inactive state? >>> >> >> I believe something very similar (not only for mount units) was >> reported recently, but I do not have reference handy. I mean, processes >> belonging to stopped unit (e.g. with KillMode=none) are not displayed. >> > > This commit is probably needed: > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=dab5bf859900c0abdbf78c584e4aed42a19768cd
That indeed looks like a likely candidate. I'll try breaking things again and checking status output with this patch applied. Thanks! Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
