В Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:34:07 +0000 Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> пишет:
> > Anyway, assuming the process is in the .mount unit cgroup, should > systemd detect the umount and kill the processes accordingly, and if It does not do it currently. It only starts killing if (u)mount times out. Otherwise if umount is successful it goes to stopped state immediately. Although it probably should, even for the sake of user space helpers. > not, should calling "systemctl status" on .mount units show processes > even if it's in an inactive state? > I believe something very similar (not only for mount units) was reported recently, but I do not have reference handy. I mean, processes belonging to stopped unit (e.g. with KillMode=none) are not displayed. > This is with 217 with a few cherry picks on top so might have been > addressed by now. > > > Cheers > > Col > _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
