On Tue, 21.10.14 21:22, Christian Seiler ([email protected]) wrote: > Am 21.10.2014 20:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > >> Debian's systemd package currently includes a variant of Martin's > >> patch that does include additional directories. So your point that > >> ProtectSystem= does the same thing on every distro is already not > >> true. > > > > Which ones precisely? > > Here: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/patches/Include-additional-directories-in-ProtectSystem.patch > (included in debian/patches/series under the heading 'Debian-specific > patches')
Ah, well, at least they should make the lib64 thing arch dependent. > Otherwise, since you are obviously dead-set against this, I'm not going > to argue this further (I don't think I will be able convince you), even > though I disagree with a lot of your points of view in your reply. > Unless you'd be interested in my response regardless, then I'd be happy > to actually write it up. Yeah, I think it will be hard to convince me otherwise. Sorry! THis is one thing to agree to disagree on I figure. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
