On Tue, 21.10.14 13:38, Simon McVittie ([email protected]) wrote:
> On 21/10/14 13:03, Christian Seiler wrote: > > That is definitely a good point. Also note that /lib32 is not included > > in the patch... > > lib64 is part of the Linux/x86_64 platform ABI (the exact path > /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 is hard-coded into every Linux/x86_64 > executable) so it cannot be considered legacy. Is there a Linux ABI > where /lib32 has the same status? If not, then its priority is rather lower. > > Debian x86_64 (amd64) systems with bi-arch i386 binaries (ia32-libs) are > the only instance of /lib32 that I can think of, and that setup is > superseded by multiarch these days. Well, on some distros lib64 is a symlink on others it isn't. Doesn't Debian have /lib/<arch> or so with /lib64 just a symlink to the right subdir? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
