On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Emil Renner Berthing <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18 September 2014 15:56, Karol Lewandowski <[email protected]> > wrote:> >> I think it would be way better (and easy) to reimplement original >> secure_getenv() rather than falling back to function with different >> semantics. secure_ is there for a reason. > > Agreed. Added to my TODO, thanks.
Yeah, please do this in the libc. We cannot fall back to broken/insecure behaviour. Cheers, Tom _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
