On 18 September 2014 15:56, Karol Lewandowski <[email protected]> wrote:>
> I think it would be way better (and easy) to reimplement original
> secure_getenv() rather than falling back to function with different
> semantics.  secure_ is there for a reason.

Agreed. Added to my TODO, thanks.

/Emil
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Reply via email to