On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> wrote: > I have been looking at our bugs [1-10, there are others too] related to > enabling/disabling of units and following of symlinks. Currently this > is an unintuitive mess and some changes will have to be made.
Another goal I have for any refinement in "enable" behavior is defining how instances should work with commands. For example, because we check "is-enabled" against the target of the symlinks, "systemctl is-enabled [email protected]" returns false unless there's a specific "[email protected]" unit (IIRC). So, "status" functions differently from "is-enabled" in terms of how it matches up data. This gets really weird when it comes to displaying the "enabled" state in the "status" output. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
