On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Andrey Borzenkov <[email protected]> wrote: > This completely changes semantic of what it does. In this case no > symlink is needed in the first place - just > "touch .../unit.wants/other.unit" would be enough, as long as we assume > units can only be located in standard config paths.
That's interesting. I hadn't thought of that option. The only downside would be the loss of shell tooling related to finding stale symlinks. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
