On Thu, 25.07.13 19:19, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Anyway, I don't get what you are trying to achieve by your patch please > > elaborate. > > My thought was simple: "Hey! what is doing CAP_MKNOD here since is not > needed anymore for udev, remove them!". Ok course, I did not think in > containers, my bad. > > Anyway, this should be changed to something more "obvious" thing for > testing about running environment. > > Q: If udev should not run in container why not udevd itself check about > this? It's an optimization. ConditionCapability= means we don't even bother with forking off the udev process when running in a container. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
