'Twas brillig, and Frederic Crozat at 25/07/13 09:54 did gyre and gimble: > Le jeudi 25 juillet 2013 à 10:45 +0200, Thomas Bächler a écrit : >> Am 25.07.2013 10:18, schrieb Frederic Crozat: >>> Le mercredi 24 juillet 2013 à 18:41 -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi a >>> écrit : >>>> Signed-off-by: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> units/systemd-udev-settle.service.in | 1 - >>>> units/systemd-udev-trigger.service.in | 1 - >>>> units/systemd-udevd-control.socket | 1 - >>>> units/systemd-udevd-kernel.socket | 1 - >>>> 4 files changed, 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> What do you expect to fix with this patch ? >>> >>> This will just break distro containers (nspawn / lxc) since it will >>> cause udev to be started there. >> >> If these units should not be started in containers, this should be >> reflected with ConditionVirtualization. ConditionCapability is not >> related to containers at all. > > Kay changed from ConditionVirtualizaton to ConditionCapability with > commit 9371e6f3e04b03692c23e392fdf005a08ccf1edb (Date: Wed Oct 12 > 02:02:16 2011 +0200)
I guess the fact that the udev units no longer need CAP_MKNOD (with that functionality moving to kmod and tmpfiles) means that this condition seems rather wrong these days. Perhaps the ConditionVirtualization may be the more appropriate one again these days? Col -- Colin Guthrie gmane(at)colin.guthr.ie http://colin.guthr.ie/ Day Job: Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/ Open Source: Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/ PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/ Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/ _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
