On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 22:02, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 21:59, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> It should be possible: selinux, lzma, z should not be needed. I think >>> they just appeared in the systemd tree, and did not in the udev tree. >>> There will be a lot of turnaround in the systemd tree then next weeks >>> and udev will see some changes, so the current state just reflects a: >>> "it builds after the merge" nothing else really. >> >> Oh, then I guessed right :-) >> >> As for the linkage review, yeah it would help. > > Yeah, we will look into that. It's about time to split up util.c in > shared/acl.c, shared/pathname.c and such, and let them not pull in all > the stuff which are not needed.
Libattr and libcap are gone now from the tools which do not need them: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=d7832d2c6e0ef5f2839a2296c1cc2fc85c7d9632 Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
