On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > Right, when udevadm is there, then there is udevd, which definitely > needs all of them.
Thats a good point - and if udevd really needs them, then there's no escaping. So I guess there is nothing to gain here :( Daniel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
