On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 16:02, Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Of course, distributions may still decide the other way, and introduce >>> a libnotify06 package... >> >> Sure, that's the default for Debian/Ubuntu/SUSE, to have rpm names for >> libs with the so version: >> libnotify-devel-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 >> libnotify1-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 >> libnotify-tools-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 >> >> I guess the so version is now 2? But the problem remains that the >> devel package has conflicting files then. :) > > Its 4 actually, for some reason.
Stuff removed bit by bit. :) > As for the file conflicts: you could just do the one-time porting thing... > :-). > Patches for most libnotify users should be in rawhide packages and > upstream bugtrackers by now. Yeah, thing is that the next distro release will not be with GNOME3. Anyway things are as they are, I'll just keep reverting the requirement as long as it is needed. Does not matter much. Thanks, Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
