On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 15:50, Matthias Clasen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Kay Sievers <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> libnotify 0.7 does not require gtk at all. >> >> Hmm, whatever it is, there is an incompatible change, and the old an >> the new version can not be installed in parallel, isn't it? >> >> And all others besides Fedora are stuck with the old version which >> does not work with the code in systemd, right? >> > > Yes. > There's an area of diminishing returns when making things parallel > installable. You don't want teeny, unstable libraries to grow parallel > versions, really. In this case, > we decided for one-time porting pain.
Sure no problem, it's just that things got a bit fast now. Seems everybody woke up now and gets old stuff cleaned up. :) > Of course, distributions may still decide the other way, and introduce > a libnotify06 package... Sure, that's the default for Debian/Ubuntu/SUSE, to have rpm names for libs with the so version: libnotify-devel-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 libnotify1-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 libnotify-tools-0.6.0-1.2.x86_64 I guess the so version is now 2? But the problem remains that the devel package has conflicting files then. :) Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
