Hi Gustavo, > >> >> I think new projects from 2010 should not have ipv4-only. This time > >> >> should be over, finally. And people should get used to see ipv6 > >> >> everywhere, and we should try to break the chicken-egg thing wherever > >> >> possible. :) > >> >> > >> >> I can see the use for a systemd without any IP networking, but > >> >> compiling-out ipv6 seems like the wrong thing to me. Sure, we should > >> >> make sure, that systemd handles a kernel without ipv6 gracefully, but > >> >> not offer a switch to stay in the IP stone age. :) > >> > > >> > That means I'll have to maintain this patch outside tree forever? :-) > >> > >> btw, if you allow my patch to get in, in consideration I will kindly > >> create a new patch that flags if ipv6 support is present and if not > >> fallback to my ipv4 code... but that also means we need review of my > >> provided ipv4 code ;-) > > > > this is the wrong approach. I agree with Kay here in that systemd needs > > to handle gracefully a kernel where IPv6 is disabled, but that should be > > all that it is doing. > > Damn! and I was thinking about providing a connman build without ipv6... :-D > > BTW, could you provide some connman.service in your next release?
if you have done so already, please send a patch. We can clearly include these. I still have the BlueZ patches from Lennart on my todo list. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
