On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gustavo, > >> >> I think new projects from 2010 should not have ipv4-only. This time >> >> should be over, finally. And people should get used to see ipv6 >> >> everywhere, and we should try to break the chicken-egg thing wherever >> >> possible. :) >> >> >> >> I can see the use for a systemd without any IP networking, but >> >> compiling-out ipv6 seems like the wrong thing to me. Sure, we should >> >> make sure, that systemd handles a kernel without ipv6 gracefully, but >> >> not offer a switch to stay in the IP stone age. :) >> > >> > That means I'll have to maintain this patch outside tree forever? :-) >> >> btw, if you allow my patch to get in, in consideration I will kindly >> create a new patch that flags if ipv6 support is present and if not >> fallback to my ipv4 code... but that also means we need review of my >> provided ipv4 code ;-) > > this is the wrong approach. I agree with Kay here in that systemd needs > to handle gracefully a kernel where IPv6 is disabled, but that should be > all that it is doing.
Damn! and I was thinking about providing a connman build without ipv6... :-D BTW, could you provide some connman.service in your next release? -- Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri http://profusion.mobi embedded systems -------------------------------------- MSN: [email protected] Skype: gsbarbieri Mobile: +55 (19) 9225-2202 _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
