> On Jun 28, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jun 28, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Austin Zheng <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This makes sense. If nobody objects I'll prepare a proposal today. >> >> By the way, on the topic of design topics: is there any core team support >> for removing associated type inference? I have a proposal there that I would >> like to move into the formal review stage at some point. > > Well, *I* want to remove associated type inference because I feel that we > shouldn’t have global inference like this in Swift. I am, however, concerned > about the standard library’s ability to make conformances to the Collection > protocols provide meaningful defaults for, e.g., the SubSequence associated > type.
I am also +1 on the concept, but haven’t had a chance to fully consider the ramifications. -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
