> On 28 Jun 2016, at 20:00, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Well, *I* want to remove associated type inference because I feel that we 
> shouldn’t have global inference like this in Swift. I am, however, concerned 
> about the standard library’s ability to make conformances to the Collection 
> protocols provide meaningful defaults for, e.g., the SubSequence associated 
> type.
> 
>       - Doug

I am also for removing associated type inference, and I guess if it needs to be 
done, its now. Concerning SubSequence, isn’t that supposed to be away post 
Swift-3 once we have some of the more powerful generics?
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to