> On 28 Jun 2016, at 20:00, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Well, *I* want to remove associated type inference because I feel that we
> shouldn’t have global inference like this in Swift. I am, however, concerned
> about the standard library’s ability to make conformances to the Collection
> protocols provide meaningful defaults for, e.g., the SubSequence associated
> type.
>
> - Doug
I am also for removing associated type inference, and I guess if it needs to be
done, its now. Concerning SubSequence, isn’t that supposed to be away post
Swift-3 once we have some of the more powerful generics?
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution